2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2014.12.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple sclerosis in children and adolescents. An important differential diagnosis of acute neurological disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, known group validity of the PFS was supported, in that those individuals with chronic conditions reported higher levels of physical and mental fatigability than individuals in the health adults group. This finding is consistent with research that has supports that persons with chronic conditions exhibit high levels of fatigability (Dobkin, 2008; Finsterer and Mahjoub, 2014; Kluger et al, 2013; Sandvig et al, 2015). Taken together, while findings are generally favorable and support the validity of the PFS, it is likely that the items that are exhibiting poor reliability are likely having a negative impact on the psychometric validity of the scale.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, known group validity of the PFS was supported, in that those individuals with chronic conditions reported higher levels of physical and mental fatigability than individuals in the health adults group. This finding is consistent with research that has supports that persons with chronic conditions exhibit high levels of fatigability (Dobkin, 2008; Finsterer and Mahjoub, 2014; Kluger et al, 2013; Sandvig et al, 2015). Taken together, while findings are generally favorable and support the validity of the PFS, it is likely that the items that are exhibiting poor reliability are likely having a negative impact on the psychometric validity of the scale.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Second, known group validity was only examined for the Physical Fatigability score. In addition, prior development work has focused solely on older adults with no psychometric data to support or refute the clinical utility of this measure in chronic conditions where high levels of fatigability are common (Dobkin, 2008; Finsterer and Mahjoub, 2014; Kluger et al, 2013; Sandvig et al, 2015). Moreover, published data regarding the PFS in independent samples (i.e.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…40 Three studies in our review (2 from Italy and 1 from the United States) reported the FSS on this scale, with means ranging from 27.1 to 30.06. [41][42][43] Four studies reported on fatigue using the percentage of patients self-reporting fatigue (range, 23%-61.1%) [44][45][46][47] with 1 study from Canada finding a larger proportion of patients with POMS reporting chronic fatigue (43.8% vs 0.0%) compared with age-matched healthy controls. 47 One study reported on fatigue using the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale, presenting a mean of 32.52 among patients with POMS compared with 23.10 among ageand sex-matched healthy controls.…”
Section: Quality Of Lifementioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 Apesar do diagnóstico ser geralmente realizado na idade adulta, os sintomas surgem antes dos 18 anos em até cerca de 10% dos indivíduos. 1,3,4 A aplicabilidade dos critérios de McDonald no diagnóstico de EM em crianças com idade igual ou superior a 11 anos já se encontra estabelecida desde a sua revisão em 2010. 5 Na revisão de 2017, as lesões sintomáticas foram incluídas para demonstrar disseminação no tempo (DT) e no espaço (DE), assim como a síntese intratecal de bandas oligoclonais (BOCs) passou a representar um critério para DT e as lesões corticais um critério para DE.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified