2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2019.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple response optimization: Analysis of genetic programming for symbolic regression and assessment of desirability functions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section, it is shown the features of two techniques that were used in the proposed procedure to deal with problems with multiple responses by the Response Surface Methodology (RMS), considering the occurrence of uncertainties in the factors of the studied process. As highlighted by Gomes et al (2019)), in process optimization problems, it is of fundamental importance to develop adequate models that mathematically describe the relationship between independent variables x i and response variables y s . The models can be classified in two broad classes (Chen et al, 2018): phenomenological models and empirical models.…”
Section: Background Of Response Surface Methodology and Optimization Via Monte Carlo Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, it is shown the features of two techniques that were used in the proposed procedure to deal with problems with multiple responses by the Response Surface Methodology (RMS), considering the occurrence of uncertainties in the factors of the studied process. As highlighted by Gomes et al (2019)), in process optimization problems, it is of fundamental importance to develop adequate models that mathematically describe the relationship between independent variables x i and response variables y s . The models can be classified in two broad classes (Chen et al, 2018): phenomenological models and empirical models.…”
Section: Background Of Response Surface Methodology and Optimization Via Monte Carlo Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A symbolic regression was performed by the genetic programming using Eureqa Formulize v. 1.2.4.0 software (Nutonian, Inc., Boston, MA, USA) [23]. Four fit models were selected according to the maximum coefficient of determination (R 2 ≥ 0.99).…”
Section: Central Composite Rotational Design (Ccrd): Interplay Of Carbon and Nitrogen Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, the models represent more than 99.8% of the variation (R 2 = 0.998), indicating an excellent fit quality to experimental data. Similarly, Gomes et al [23] built optimization models that exhibited minimal relative error using genetic programming by Eureqa. The optimization of the models considered the yields through the NMinimize function of Wolfram Mathematica because of the exceeding cost of commercial cellulase used in enzymatic hydrolysis [17].…”
Section: Carbon and Nitrogen Optimization Through Ccrd And Genetic Programmingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Desirability optimization methodology, introduced by Derringer and Suich, is a promising choice for the simultaneous optimization of various functions of a process. In this methodology, responses are converted into dimensionless desirability values called d i , in which desirability values close to zero indicates an undesirable quality, whereas values close to unity signal more desirable regions [30,31]. The global desirability of the process can be obtained using Eq.…”
Section: Desirability Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%