2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2020.12.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple populations co-evolutionary particle swarm optimization for multi-objective cardinality constrained portfolio optimization problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…2) WFG Test Set: 6 instances, MaOEA-DDFC and NMPSO achieve the best value on 3 instances, followed by EFR-RR which obtains the best result on only 1 instance, while MOEA/D-PaS and MOMBI-II do not perform best on any instances. When comprehensively considering the best result and the second-best result, Mo4Ma-DE obtains promising performance on 14 out of 27 instances, superior to all the compared algorithms.…”
Section: B Experimental Results and Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2) WFG Test Set: 6 instances, MaOEA-DDFC and NMPSO achieve the best value on 3 instances, followed by EFR-RR which obtains the best result on only 1 instance, while MOEA/D-PaS and MOMBI-II do not perform best on any instances. When comprehensively considering the best result and the second-best result, Mo4Ma-DE obtains promising performance on 14 out of 27 instances, superior to all the compared algorithms.…”
Section: B Experimental Results and Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the WFG2 test problem, when M is 5, the overall performance of Mo4Ma-DE becomes worse as k increases. When M is 10, the performance in the interval [2,6] is the best, and IGD reaches the minimum value when k = 3. 2) For some test problems, different values of k may cause a slight fluctuation of performance, such as DTLZ4 and WFG2.…”
Section: Parameter Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhou et al (2020) modeled the airline crew rostering problem as a bi-objective optimization problem that aimed at optimizing both the fairness and satisfaction of crew, and they extended the MPMO framework to efficiently solve the proposed model. Zhao et al (2021) proposed to use the MPMO framework for solving multi-objective cardinality constrained portfolio optimization problems. Liu et al (2021a) proposed to use the MPMO framework-based multiobjective PSO to solve the emergency resource dispatch problem.…”
Section: Extending Application Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A hybrid complementary heuristic strategy and a local search strategy were designed in MOACS to help explore the global Pareto front sufficiently of CRP. A coevolutionary PSO algorithm was proposed by Zhao et al in [92], which was applied in solving multi-objective cardinality constrained PO problem. Bidirectional local search strategy and hybrid elite competition strategy were designed to improve the solution accuracy and bring diversity to avoid local Pareto front.…”
Section: Mpmo-based Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%