2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple necking pattern in nonlinear elastic bars subjected to dynamic stretching: The role of defects and inertia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
36
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To track the history of the growth rate of all the growing modes during the post-homogeneous deformation process (i.e. for strains greater than the Considère strain), we use the cumulative instability index I = t 0 η + dt [21,38,42,43]. The index I accumulates the growth rate of all the growing modes during the loading process, i.e.…”
Section: Theoretical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To track the history of the growth rate of all the growing modes during the post-homogeneous deformation process (i.e. for strains greater than the Considère strain), we use the cumulative instability index I = t 0 η + dt [21,38,42,43]. The index I accumulates the growth rate of all the growing modes during the loading process, i.e.…”
Section: Theoretical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this end, following [18,22,45], we introduce the concept of cumulative instability index defined as I = t t considère η + dt, where t considère corresponds to the time at maximum force (onset of post-critical regime). Unlike the instantaneous perturbation growthη + , the cumulative index-which integrates the dimensional growth rate of the perturbation-tracks the history of the growth rate of all the growing modes during the post-critical deformation process and, as such, provides a more accurate description of the dominant necking modes which determine the localization pattern for each level of strain [22,35]. The reader is referred to the paper of Vaz-Romero et al [35] to see a comparison between the results obtained with the instantaneous perturbation growth and the cumulative instability index for the problem of a nonlinear elastic bar subjected to dynamic stretching.…”
Section: Comparison Between Linear Stability Analysis and Finite-elemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike the instantaneous perturbation growthη + , the cumulative index-which integrates the dimensional growth rate of the perturbation-tracks the history of the growth rate of all the growing modes during the post-critical deformation process and, as such, provides a more accurate description of the dominant necking modes which determine the localization pattern for each level of strain [22,35]. The reader is referred to the paper of Vaz-Romero et al [35] to see a comparison between the results obtained with the instantaneous perturbation growth and the cumulative instability index for the problem of a nonlinear elastic bar subjected to dynamic stretching. The key point is the calibration of the cumulative index in such a manner that the predictive capabilities of the stability analysis can be exploited.…”
Section: Comparison Between Linear Stability Analysis and Finite-elemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notice that Dudzinski and Molinari (1991) and Zaera et al (2015) relied on the instantaneous instability indexη + to determine when a neck is formed, in order to construct forming limit diagrams. However, in this paper we choose I because, as discussed by El Maï et al 2014and Vaz-Romero et al (2017), it provides predictions for necking formation which are generally closer to finite element results.…”
Section: Linear Stability Modelmentioning
confidence: 83%