2020
DOI: 10.1115/1.4045841
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamics of Necking and Fracture in Ductile Porous Materials

Abstract: bines the effects of loading rate, material properties and unit cell size. Our results show that low initial porosity levels favor necking before fracture, and high initial porosity levels favor fracture before necking, especially at high loading rates where inertia effects delay the onset of necking. The finite element results are also compared with the predictions of linear stability analysis of necking instabilities in porous ductile materials.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that, as ∆ increases, the cumulative instability index I neck decreases (see also Fig. 10 of Zheng et al (2020) and the discussion therein, and Appendix C of N'souglo et al (2020)). As in Sections 6.1, 6.2 and 6.4, the imposed initial major strain rate isε 0…”
Section: The Effect Of Imperfection Amplitudementioning
confidence: 94%
“…Note that, as ∆ increases, the cumulative instability index I neck decreases (see also Fig. 10 of Zheng et al (2020) and the discussion therein, and Appendix C of N'souglo et al (2020)). As in Sections 6.1, 6.2 and 6.4, the imposed initial major strain rate isε 0…”
Section: The Effect Of Imperfection Amplitudementioning
confidence: 94%
“…For the given range of initial equivalent strain rates, the parameter describing the inertial resistance to motionL −1 varies between 0.00166 and 0.333 (see equation (31)). Note that previous numerical results reported by N'souglo et al [36,35] and Zheng et al [54] indicated that dynamic effects start to play an important role in the inception of necks forL −1 in the range 0.06 − 0.1. The finite element results are compared with the predictions of the linear stability analysis.…”
Section: Effect Of the Third Invariant On The Formation Of Dynamic Necks In Materials With The Same Response In Tension And Compression Amentioning
confidence: 66%
“…et al ( 2009), Golovashchenko et al (2013) and Li et al (2017), among others). Moreover, the numerical results reported by N'souglo et al (2020) and Zheng et al (2020) indicated that the effect of inertia on neck retardation starts to be important forL −1 in the range 0.06 − 0.1. Initial void volume fractions ranging from 0.01 to 0.1 are considered.…”
Section: The Effect Of Porosity 360mentioning
confidence: 83%