“…However, there is little consensus on what diversity means in light of changing sociocultural identifications, what the policy goals and strategies are or should be and who or what should benefit from a diversity agenda (Penrose, 2013;Vertovec, 2012). But while there is no reliable consensus and a clear agenda around diversity, given that different political ideologies (separatism, assimilation and integration) underpin the variety of meanings it has (Penrose, 2013), Vertovec (2012) suggests that it has become 'an omnipresent emblem of openness and fairness' (p. 302) and has been 'institutionalized, internationalized, and internalized' (p. 309). One of the major problems with its discursive ubiquity is that while the recognition of a range of diversities such as age, ethnicity, gender, disability and sexuality is important, it can mean a loss of political efficacy around tackling the specific mechanisms of racism for instance.…”