2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10530-019-02057-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple introductions and efficient propagule dispersion can lead to high genetic variability in an invasive clonal species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The current finding is consistent with the similar trend of results reported by Rungnoi et al 1 estimated ΔK = 2 using ISSR and RAPD in 363 Bambara groundnut genotypes while Olukolu et al 5 reported ΔK = 4 using DArT assay of 40 Bambara groundnut genotypes. Additionally, other researchers had the parallel statement such as Wu et al 49 found ΔK = 3 using ISSR; Nilkanta et al 42 found ΔK = 3 using ISSR; Zarei and Erfani-Moghadam et al 65 found ΔK = 3 using SCoT; Barbosa et al 71 found ΔK = 3 using ISSR; Zimisuhara et al 51 found ΔK = 2 using ISSR; Li and Zhang 72 found ΔK = 2 using ISSR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The current finding is consistent with the similar trend of results reported by Rungnoi et al 1 estimated ΔK = 2 using ISSR and RAPD in 363 Bambara groundnut genotypes while Olukolu et al 5 reported ΔK = 4 using DArT assay of 40 Bambara groundnut genotypes. Additionally, other researchers had the parallel statement such as Wu et al 49 found ΔK = 3 using ISSR; Nilkanta et al 42 found ΔK = 3 using ISSR; Zarei and Erfani-Moghadam et al 65 found ΔK = 3 using SCoT; Barbosa et al 71 found ΔK = 3 using ISSR; Zimisuhara et al 51 found ΔK = 2 using ISSR; Li and Zhang 72 found ΔK = 2 using ISSR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…F st values can range from 0 to 1, where 0 means complete sharing of genetic material (two population can interbreeding freely) or panmictic population and 1 means all genetic variation is explained by the population structure, and that the two populations do not share any genetic diversity, or the populations are fixed 73 . A standard scale of fixation index is F st < 0.05 = little genetic difference; F st = 0.05–0.15 = moderate genetic difference; F st = 0.15–0.25 = great genetic difference; F st > 0.25 = very great genetic difference established by Hartl and Clark, 71 . Moreover, F st > 0.15 = significant differentiation and F st < 0.05 = insignificant differentiation reported by Frankham et al 74 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, no particular genotype was found dominant across the regions. Lack of correlation between genetic diversity and geographic distances in S. wightiana could be associated with successful sexual reproduction between genets followed by long-range seed dispersion by human or animal agents, and subsequent recruitment in isolated S. wightiana populations enabling the gene flow between populations and forming diverse genetic admixtures 74 . The present study also found the successful transferability of these microsatellite markers, which could be used for further studies at a finer scale.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of niche dynamics could derive various features from the niche conservatism hypothesis (Pearman et al 2008), in particular, whether the climatic niche requirements of IAS shift between native and invaded ranges (Atwater et al 2018;Dellinger et al 2016;Manzoor et al 2020). In accordance with this hypothesis, the unifying framework for niche dynamics could be broadly decomposed into three niche patterns, including niche stability (the proportion of an exotic niche of an IAS overlapping with its native niche), niche expansion (the proportion of an exotic niche of IAS that is not occupied in its native range), and niche un lling (the proportion of the native niche of an IAS that is not yet occupied in its exotic range) ( IAS experience niche dynamics in novel environments through ecological and/or evolutionary changes, for example, release from top-down regulators and/or niche occupation in invaded ranges (Alexander and Edwards 2010), increased phenotypic plasticity associated with rapid growth and fast phenological development (Hahn et al 2012), and/or rapid evolutionary adjustments driven by high genetic diversity (Barbosa et al 2019). However, these mechanisms may also bring about inconsistent niche dynamic patterns in IAS in different invaded environments (Datta et al 2019;Dinis et al 2020;Pili et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the occurrence of inconsistency in niche dynamics could be closely associated with adaptive responses of IAS resulting from differences in invasion trajectories (Banerjee et al 2019b; Barbosa et al 2019). The invasion trajectory demonstrates a series of stages that an IAS goes through when its propagules are transported to a new area (Reise et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%