2018
DOI: 10.5606/archrheumatol.2018.6569
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple Eruptive Dermatofibromas in a Patient With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Treated With Methylprednisolone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
1
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This discrepancy may suggest the rapid progression of MEDFs. We found that MEDFs accounts for 42.5 % of all multiple DFs; this is a higher prevalence than reported in previous studies [42].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This discrepancy may suggest the rapid progression of MEDFs. We found that MEDFs accounts for 42.5 % of all multiple DFs; this is a higher prevalence than reported in previous studies [42].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…Full‐texts of 11 articles were not accessible and 30 articles were irrelevant after assessing the full‐text. Eventually, 96 studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria and were included [1–96] (Figure 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While solitary dermatofibromas may be incidental findings, multiple dermatofibromas may be associated with systemic conditions, such as autoimmune diseases, cancer, chromosomal abnormalities, immunodeficiency, metabolic disorders; or previous therapies [1,2]. The presence of many dermatofibromas in a patient without relevant associations, as in this case, is an even less frequent situation.…”
Section: Teaching Pointmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Die Diskrepanz weist möglicherweise auf die schnelle Progression von MEDF hin. Wir stellten fest, dass MEDF 42,5 % aller multiplen DF ausmacht; dies ist eine höhere Prävalenz als in früheren Studien [42].…”
Section: Diskussionunclassified
“…Dies steht im Gegensatz zu mehr als der Hälfte unserer Fälle. Daher ist diese Definition möglicherweise nicht angemessen [34, 42]. In unserer systematischen Übersicht betrug die mittlere berichtete Dauer bei MEDF etwa zwei Jahre und war damit länger als die früher vorgeschlagene Dauer von vier Monaten [3] aber viel kürzer als die sieben oder zehn Jahre die für multiple DF beziehungsweise MCDF berichtet wurden.…”
Section: Diskussionunclassified