2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.irfa.2016.10.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple-days-ahead value-at-risk and expected shortfall forecasting for stock indices, commodities and exchange rates: Inter-day versus intra-day data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Working with daily data January 1993 and 2013, the author fits the data into three different non-linear long memory volatility models (FIGARCH, FIAPARCH, HYGARCH) and finds that for all three white metals, a Fractionally Integrated Asymmetric Power ARCH (FIAPARCH) model is best suited to capture their long memory, asymmetry and fat tails, outperforming the other models in predicting oneday-ahead VaR positions. Degiannakis and Potamia (2016) base their research on the recommendations of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision and examine whether inter-day or intra-day model provide accurate predictions for reliable Valueat-Risk (VaR) and Expected Shortfall (ES) forecasts. Daily data for silver between the 3 rd of January 2000 and the 5 th of August 2015, indicates that a GARCH-skT model, relying on inter-day data, provides better results than a HAR-RV-skT model, as it satisifes most of the conditions implied in VaR and ES forecasting, but that it overall fails to provide accurate forecasts of the risk measures implied.…”
Section: Modeling Price Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Working with daily data January 1993 and 2013, the author fits the data into three different non-linear long memory volatility models (FIGARCH, FIAPARCH, HYGARCH) and finds that for all three white metals, a Fractionally Integrated Asymmetric Power ARCH (FIAPARCH) model is best suited to capture their long memory, asymmetry and fat tails, outperforming the other models in predicting oneday-ahead VaR positions. Degiannakis and Potamia (2016) base their research on the recommendations of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision and examine whether inter-day or intra-day model provide accurate predictions for reliable Valueat-Risk (VaR) and Expected Shortfall (ES) forecasts. Daily data for silver between the 3 rd of January 2000 and the 5 th of August 2015, indicates that a GARCH-skT model, relying on inter-day data, provides better results than a HAR-RV-skT model, as it satisifes most of the conditions implied in VaR and ES forecasting, but that it overall fails to provide accurate forecasts of the risk measures implied.…”
Section: Modeling Price Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They analyzed the accuracy of VaR and ES at 95% and 99% level of confidence. Degiannakis & Potamia (2017) check the intraday reliability of VaR and ES predictions with the recommendations of basel committee of banking supervision. The multiple periods VaR and ES predictions are adequate for 95% level of confidence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Idiosyncratic risk factors prediction is under Model 14. The sensitivity of stock excess returns and idiosyncratic risk factors increases with the increase in the level of confidence of ES, which advocates the proposition of Degiannakis et al [31].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%