2011 - MILCOM 2011 Military Communications Conference 2011
DOI: 10.1109/milcom.2011.6127593
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple-call handover decisions using fuzzy MCGDM in heterogeneous wireless networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…RSS is calculated from the predicted locations following the transmission model (1), (2), and the other attributes are set to vary randomly following Table III. For comparison purposes, we simulate: a) RSS-based handover method, b) fuzzy multiple criteria group decision making (Fuzzy MCGDM) algorithm [18], c) fuzzy technique for order preference by similarity to the ideal situation (FTOP-SIS) [42], d) the proposed FAHP-based algorithm, and e) the proposed FAHP-based algorithm with uniform location errors of 10∼20 m (FAHP with errors).…”
Section: Mptcp-based Seamless Handover Executionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RSS is calculated from the predicted locations following the transmission model (1), (2), and the other attributes are set to vary randomly following Table III. For comparison purposes, we simulate: a) RSS-based handover method, b) fuzzy multiple criteria group decision making (Fuzzy MCGDM) algorithm [18], c) fuzzy technique for order preference by similarity to the ideal situation (FTOP-SIS) [42], d) the proposed FAHP-based algorithm, and e) the proposed FAHP-based algorithm with uniform location errors of 10∼20 m (FAHP with errors).…”
Section: Mptcp-based Seamless Handover Executionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Falowo and Chan [3] first studied the problem of making vertical handover decisions for multiple classes of services from a MMT in HWNs and proposed an algorithm. To reduce the frequency of vertical handover, Falowo and Chan [1] used a RAT preference margin which represents the metric of the target network superior to the current connected network and proposed a dynamic MMT RAT selection algorithm.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Otherwise, the scheme will make independent decisions. However, only user preferences have been considered in [1]- [3], and [20].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These issues include: (a) selection of the appropriate criteria for making RAT-selection decisions, (b) determination of individual user's preferences for different RATs based on the user's specified weights, (c) the assignment of priority weight for each criteria of each service class, and (d) the use of an efficient multi-criteria group decision making (MCGDM) algorithm for making RAT-selection decisions in HWNs [4], [5].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though a lot of research effort has concentrated on developing RAT-selection algorithms for making RATselection decisions for single-session from an MT in HWNs, not much has been reported in the literature on RATselection for multiple handoff sessions [1], [2], [3], [4], [5].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%