The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2021
DOI: 10.1007/s40747-020-00255-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple attribute group decision-making based on cubic linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy sets and power Hamy mean

Abstract: The linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy sets (LPFSs), which employ linguistic terms to express membership and non-membership degrees, can effectively deal with decision makers’ complicated evaluation values in the process of multiple attribute group decision-making (MAGDM). To improve the ability of LPFSs in depicting fuzzy information, this paper generalized LPFSs to cubic LPFSs (CLPFSs) and studied CLPFSs-based MAGDM method. First, the definition, operational rules, comparison method and distance measure of CLPFSs … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it is necessary to study the quality evaluation of physical education based on fuzzy multi-attribute decision-making [6][7][8][9][10][11]. Then, how to make the final judgment and ranking of the commodities in the commodity selection of the e-commerce platform, it is necessary to apply the fuzzy MADM method [12][13][14][15][16][17]. The fuzzy MADM method is mainly divided into two steps: one is to use the fuzzy MADM method to find out the fuzzy utility value of each scheme; the second is to use the fuzzy sorting method to deal with the fuzzy utility [18][19][20][21][22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is necessary to study the quality evaluation of physical education based on fuzzy multi-attribute decision-making [6][7][8][9][10][11]. Then, how to make the final judgment and ranking of the commodities in the commodity selection of the e-commerce platform, it is necessary to apply the fuzzy MADM method [12][13][14][15][16][17]. The fuzzy MADM method is mainly divided into two steps: one is to use the fuzzy MADM method to find out the fuzzy utility value of each scheme; the second is to use the fuzzy sorting method to deal with the fuzzy utility [18][19][20][21][22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the best alternative is Θ 4 . Next, we make a comparison between the proposed 2TLCq-ROFWDPMM operator and the weighted dual PMSM (WDPMSM) operator based on the CLPyFS [49]. Accordingly, we are able to get the ranking as: Θ 5 > Θ 4 > Θ 3 > Θ 2 > Θ 7 > Θ 1 > Θ 6 .…”
Section: Comparison With Weighted Pmsm and Weighted Dual Pmsm Operatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aggregation mechanism indicates the suitability of PA operator to balance the impact of extreme values and produce more reasonable aggregated result, and thus, PA has been widely studied in MAGDM (Kamal and Chen 2022;Liu et al 2020b;Xu et al 2021b). Particularly, Feng et al (2021) combined PA and Hamy mean to cope with MAGDM under IVq-RDHFSs information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%