2016
DOI: 10.1109/jsen.2016.2587620
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiphysics Modeling of a Lorentz Force-Based Meander Coil Electromagnetic Acoustic Transducer via Steady-State and Transient Analyses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Transient analysis of a meander-coil EMAT placed on isotropic nonferromagnetic half-space, assuming uniform static magnetic field was conducted in Ludwig and Dai (1991). The controlling eddy-current equations were studied in detail in Jafari-Shapoorabadi et al (2001) and it was argued that the previous work using the total current divided by the cross section area of the conductor as the source current density was equivalently applying the incomplete equation, and this meant ignoring the skin effect and proximity effect, while we proved the opposite in Wang et al (2016a) via customizing the underlying integrodifferential or normal differential equations. The finite element method (FEM) package COMSOL was used to build the electromagnetic model of a meander EMAT, and the simulated Lorentz force was exported to another package, Abaqus, as the driving force to excite Lamb waves in Dhayalan and Balasubramaniam (2010).…”
Section: S Wang Et Al: Optimizations Of An Emat With Ann Metamodelsmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Transient analysis of a meander-coil EMAT placed on isotropic nonferromagnetic half-space, assuming uniform static magnetic field was conducted in Ludwig and Dai (1991). The controlling eddy-current equations were studied in detail in Jafari-Shapoorabadi et al (2001) and it was argued that the previous work using the total current divided by the cross section area of the conductor as the source current density was equivalently applying the incomplete equation, and this meant ignoring the skin effect and proximity effect, while we proved the opposite in Wang et al (2016a) via customizing the underlying integrodifferential or normal differential equations. The finite element method (FEM) package COMSOL was used to build the electromagnetic model of a meander EMAT, and the simulated Lorentz force was exported to another package, Abaqus, as the driving force to excite Lamb waves in Dhayalan and Balasubramaniam (2010).…”
Section: S Wang Et Al: Optimizations Of An Emat With Ann Metamodelsmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Ludwig conducted transient analysis of a meander coil EMAT placed on isotropic non-ferromagnetic half-space, assuming uniform static magnetic field [7]. Jafari-Shapoorabadi studied in detail the controlling eddy current equations and argued that the previous work using the total current divided by the cross section area of the conductor as the source current density is equivalently applying the incomplete equation, and this means ignoring the skin effect and proximity effect [8], while we proved the opposite in [9]. Dhayalan used the FEM package COMSOL to build the electromagnetic model of a meander EMAT, and the simulated Lorentz force was exported to another package Abaqus as the driving force to excite Lamb waves [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…1 and a 2-D space is considered here. The permanent magnet is located on the top of the coil and the specimen, the S-pole of the magnet is 6 on the top with the N-pole underneath. The liftoff of the coil in the model is only 25 m, which can increase the weak coupling efficiency of the EMAT.…”
Section: Model Configurationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it has a wide range of applications for the EMAT such as rough material surface, high temperature and high speed available, etc. [5,6] Typically, the sensitivity of EMATs is affected by the transmit power, coil turns, constant external magnetic field, electrical conductivity, magnetic permeability and acoustic impedance, which is about 40 dB lower than that of PZTs. The weak transduction efficiency is currently the main challenge of EMATs in practical applications, so different types of signal processing techniques are required to enhance the signal and isolate noise .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%