2009
DOI: 10.1089/met.2008.0076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiparity and Risk of Metabolic Syndrome: Isfahan Healthy Heart Program

Abstract: A combination of lifestyle risk factors and/or biological changes associated with childbearing may explain the positive association between parity and increased risk of metabolic syndrome.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
25
1
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(37 reference statements)
6
25
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Various other studies also support this positive correlation. 8,9 Menopause is an important predictor of metabolic syndrome. In present study it is found that postmenopausal women had significantly higher prevalence of metabolic syndrome in comparison to premenopausal women (68.8% vs 37.8%) and on statistical correlation it was found to be statistically significant (p<0.05).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various other studies also support this positive correlation. 8,9 Menopause is an important predictor of metabolic syndrome. In present study it is found that postmenopausal women had significantly higher prevalence of metabolic syndrome in comparison to premenopausal women (68.8% vs 37.8%) and on statistical correlation it was found to be statistically significant (p<0.05).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 However, two other studies showed no significant relationship between parity and the prevalence of MetS after additional adjustment for body mass index (BMI). 16,17 The objective of this study was to examine whether the number of births is associated with the prevalence of MetS in a population of Chinese women, controlling for demographic, lifestyle, and reproductive factors. We hypothesized that parity is independently associated with the risk of MetS in Chinese women.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Number of pregnancies has often been studied in relation to MetS. By assessing Iranian women, Mousavi et al [32] found that the number of pregnancies in women with MetS was significantly higher than in those without MetS (5.2 ± 3.1 vs. 3.5 ± 2.6, p < 0.001). The prevalence of MetS in nulliparous women, mothers with 1 -4 children and more than 4 children was 15.2%, 26.2% and 49.6%, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%