2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2017.11.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiobjective optimization for lifecycle cost, carbon dioxide emissions and exergy of residential heat and electricity prosumers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, Weniger et al, (2014; show that in the long-term a conjunction of PV systems with batteries will be not only profitable, but also the most economical solution. Results of this study show that the role of multi-objective optimisations have an important role in determining system configurations, which offer the best performance based on costs and other system parameters (Delgado et al, 2017). Delgado et al (2017) conclude that GSHPs offer the best combinations of cost-optimality, operational equivalent CO2 emissions, and exergy among the main heat supply systems investigated, and that they are generally best complemented with PV, which is similar to the findings of this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, Weniger et al, (2014; show that in the long-term a conjunction of PV systems with batteries will be not only profitable, but also the most economical solution. Results of this study show that the role of multi-objective optimisations have an important role in determining system configurations, which offer the best performance based on costs and other system parameters (Delgado et al, 2017). Delgado et al (2017) conclude that GSHPs offer the best combinations of cost-optimality, operational equivalent CO2 emissions, and exergy among the main heat supply systems investigated, and that they are generally best complemented with PV, which is similar to the findings of this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Results of this study show that the role of multi-objective optimisations have an important role in determining system configurations, which offer the best performance based on costs and other system parameters (Delgado et al, 2017). Delgado et al (2017) conclude that GSHPs offer the best combinations of cost-optimality, operational equivalent CO2 emissions, and exergy among the main heat supply systems investigated, and that they are generally best complemented with PV, which is similar to the findings of this study. Furthermore, Delgado et al (2018) conclude that heat pumps represent the optimal main heat supply component in the Netherlands and Finland, and PV systems are the most attractive supplementary onsite generation components.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…This is mainly due to the higher battery charging losses of the aggregated buildings-vehicles system in this study than the single building-vehicles system in [37]. Furthermore, according to research results [55][56][57][58][59][60], the increase in the renewable penetration will reduce the operation cost and ECE, whereas the increase in the battery charging losses will result in the increase in ECE.…”
Section: Research Results Comparison and Accuracy Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Zhang et al (Zhang et al, 2020) analyzed the performance of the CCHP system and deduced that it can be improved by changing the electricity price, natural gas price, investment subsidy, and carbon tax. Delgado et al (Delgado et al, 2017) analyzed the sensitivity of interest rate, heat export, and energy price escalation rates to address the behavior of the results due to changes in the economic context.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%