2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41746-022-00604-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multinational landscape of health app policy: toward regulatory consensus on digital health

Abstract: Due to its enormous capacity for benefit, harm, and cost, health care is among the most tightly regulated industries in the world. But with the rise of smartphones, an explosion of direct-to-consumer mobile health applications has challenged the role of centralized gatekeepers. As interest in health apps continue to climb, national regulatory bodies have turned their attention toward strategies to protect consumers from apps that mine and sell health data, recommend unsafe practices, or simply do not work as a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(7 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, platforms and databases of mental health smartphone-based interventions have been developed [ 99 , 100 ], including information on the characteristics of the intervention, functions included, population for whom they are directed, evidence-based validation, professional support, and expert reviews. Future directions point toward international expert consensus, providing homogeneous valid indications on digital solutions’ regulation [ 101 ] and clinical validation [ 102 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, platforms and databases of mental health smartphone-based interventions have been developed [ 99 , 100 ], including information on the characteristics of the intervention, functions included, population for whom they are directed, evidence-based validation, professional support, and expert reviews. Future directions point toward international expert consensus, providing homogeneous valid indications on digital solutions’ regulation [ 101 ] and clinical validation [ 102 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Efforts to regulate AI prescriptively are both celebrated and vilified, 51 perceived as decelerating progress until we better understand the true impact of these technologies and prepare health systems to support innovative ideas. While standalone medical device regulation aims to distribute liability more evenly across the stakeholder spectrum and thus increase the regulatory impact on healthcare outcomes, 52,53 it often deflects attention from the core issues of the liability process, for example, for a telehealth device designed to triage patients, to an encounter with outpatient clinics, to hospitalization, and post-discharge digital care. The current paradigm fails to promote trust and the safe development and integration of DHIs.…”
Section: Data Value Predicament In Health Innovationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prevalence of mental health issues, such as anxiety and depression, has reached alarming levels, leading to an increasing demand for effective interventions and support systems globally [19][20][21] . Advancements in technology have paved the way for the development of mental health apps and software, which can potentially play a significant role in addressing these concerns [22][23][24][25][26][27] . Amidst these challenges, the healthcare sector has turned to digital solutions, with mental health applications (apps) emerging as a promising frontier in delivering scalable and accessible therapeutic interventions 19,[28][29][30][31][32] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%