2015
DOI: 10.1002/tesq.242
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multimodality in Education: Some Directions and Some Questions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the implications from this review, we echo the concerns of others (Hull, 2003;Mills, 2007aMills, , 2007bvan Leeuwen, 2015) and suggest that future research must take a critical stance toward multimodal composition and consider who participates in these practices, where practices are enacted, and how practices shape different learning opportunities. Given the heterogeneity of the population of students identified as ELs, more work must investigate which forms of multimodal composition might support students at different stages of their academic, linguistic, and social development.…”
Section: Recommendations For Future Researchsupporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on the implications from this review, we echo the concerns of others (Hull, 2003;Mills, 2007aMills, , 2007bvan Leeuwen, 2015) and suggest that future research must take a critical stance toward multimodal composition and consider who participates in these practices, where practices are enacted, and how practices shape different learning opportunities. Given the heterogeneity of the population of students identified as ELs, more work must investigate which forms of multimodal composition might support students at different stages of their academic, linguistic, and social development.…”
Section: Recommendations For Future Researchsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Although the research literature has confirmed these possibilities, van Leeuwen (2015) warned that researchers and teachers should not overromanticize these practices, arguing that we might “love our students’ multimodal products too much” (p. 582). A few studies explicitly addressed the challenges associated with implementing multimodal composing pedagogies and, similarly, ways in which these pedagogies might constrain students’ learning of new content or languages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As new media are introduced into composition classrooms for multimodal writing and remediation, students’ perceptions and experiences with the media outside of class shape their view of how new technological affordances can be appropriated (Hafner, 2015; Jewitt, 2005; Shin & Cimasko, 2008; van Leeuwen, 2015). Linear, linguistic mode-based texts that typify traditional print-based media can be (re)mediated into nonlinear multimodal texts, within casual and unconventional discourses that reflect the previous digital practices in which L2 students have been engaged.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study is informed by social semiotic theory, which accounts for meaningmaking processes in social and cultural contexts (Bezemer & Kress, 2008;Jewitt & Kress, 2003;Kress, 2003Kress, , 2005Kress, , 2010Kress & van Leeuwen, 2001;van Leeuwen, 2003van Leeuwen, , 2005. Within the domain of inquiry on multimodality (Kress, 2009, p. 54), we draw on the concepts of design, resemiotization, and recontextualization to explore digital multimodal texts that are remediated from one social site to another.…”
Section: Design: Resemiotizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These beliefs guide pedagogical decisions across all e-learning contexts but are particularly important for the sudden transition to online courses, as everyone is immersed in a hybrid environment as they generate new learning. In these contexts, instructors must be aware of multiple modes of communication, practices, and the principles of multimodality (Kress et al 2004 ; Latour 2005 ; Leeuwen 2015 ).…”
Section: Interactions and Interactivitymentioning
confidence: 99%