2017
DOI: 10.1177/0741088317727246
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multimodal Resemiotization and Authorial Agency in an L2 Writing Classroom

Abstract: This study examines the composing process and authorial agency of a college ESL writer as she remediated an argumentative essay into a multimodal digital video. Employing principles of sociosemiotic ethnography, and drawing on the concepts of resemiotization and recontextualization, the study investigated multiple types of data, including an argumentative paper, video transcript, multimedia video, interview transcripts, and observation notes. Data analysis shows that her choice and orchestration of modal resou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings confirm that composing multimodal texts by ESL/EFL speakers is shaped by prior experience, identity construction, and efforts to accommodate perceived audiences (Cimasko & Shin, 2017;Yang, 2012). In addition, although Chloe positioned herself as an EFL speaker and showed a willingness to improve her English proficiency, the "imagined community" (Norton, 2001) she has invested in through vlogging involves far more than just "the native culture."…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…The findings confirm that composing multimodal texts by ESL/EFL speakers is shaped by prior experience, identity construction, and efforts to accommodate perceived audiences (Cimasko & Shin, 2017;Yang, 2012). In addition, although Chloe positioned herself as an EFL speaker and showed a willingness to improve her English proficiency, the "imagined community" (Norton, 2001) she has invested in through vlogging involves far more than just "the native culture."…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Thus far, research has presented sharp divisions between portraying students’ design intentionality in opposition with a subconscious and emotionally laden multimodal composing process. Research on adolescents has also elucidated how multiple modes offer agentive ways composers can connect to content (Jocius, 2013; Newfield, 2014), engage with multiple local and global audiences (Pacheco & Smith, 2015), and express their identities (Cimasko & Dong-shin, 2017; Vasudevan et al, 2010). The results of the current study suggest that adolescents can meet several of these composing goals—intentionally or not—at the same time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When examining the multimodal practices of African American male adolescents, Vasudevan (2006) explained how “digital and visual modalities make it possible to perform and author new selves that are not only resistant to dominant images but also offer new sights of inquiry and exploration” (p. 214). Multimodal projects can serve as an empowering platform for students to reflect on their own cultural experiences and agentively express their identities to others (Cimasko & Dong-shin, 2017; Halverson, 2010; Hull & Katz, 2006).…”
Section: Theoretical Framework and Relevant Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This review has several limitations. First, the scope does not account for the insightful research on EBs’ multimodal composing in informal and out‐of‐school contexts (e.g., Black, 2009; Hull, Stornaiuolo, & Sahni, 2010; Lam, 2009), with print‐based multimodal composing (e.g., Early & Marshall, 2008; Zapata & Van Horn, 2017), in elementary grades (e.g., Marshall & Toohey, 2010; D.W. Rowe & Miller, 2016), or in university settings (e.g., Cimasko & Shin, 2017; Hafner, 2014). Furthermore, focusing solely on research in classrooms could be considered a constraint because a classroom “is not an isolated container, but positioned in a nexus of relations to other such locales” (Leander, Phillips, & Taylor, 2010, p. 336), including communities, informal learning environments, and online spaces.…”
Section: Methods Of Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%