Multimodality Comparison of Quantitative Volumetric Analysis of the Right Ventricle

Sugeng, Lissa; Mor‐Avi, Victor; Weinert, Lynn; Niel, Johannes; Ebner, Christian; Steringer‐Mascherbauer, Regina; Bartolles, Ralf; Baumann, Rolf; Schummers, Georg; Lang, Roberto M.; Nesser, Hans‐Joachim

doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2009.09.017

Cited by 243 publications

(131 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

121

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…7D). Recent studies have confirmed that 3DE measurements of the RVEF are accurate, reproducible, and correlate well with CMR both in adults and children [20,21,27,28]. In the most recent meta-analysis aimed at exploring the accuracy of different imaging modalities (2DE, 3DE, radionuclide ventriculography, computed tomography [CT], gated single-photon emission CT, and invasive cardiac cineventriculography) for RVEF using CMR as a reference method, 3DE has proven to be the most reliable technique, overestimating the RVEF by only 1.16% with the lowest limits of agreement (form -0.59 to 2.92%) [29].…”

Section: Right Ventricular Function Right Ventricular Systolic Functionmentioning

confidence: 80%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Use of novel echocardiographic techniques to assess right ventricular geometry and function

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Right Ventricular Function Right Ventricular Systolic Functionmentioning

confidence: 80%

“…The RVEF is an independent predictor of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in various conditions [2,27]. The assessment of RVEF using 2DE is no longer recommended due to its inaccuracy [9,12].…”

Section: Right Ventricular Function Right Ventricular Systolic Functionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Use of novel echocardiographic techniques to assess right ventricular geometry and function

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Three-dimensional of the RV has been validated against CMR in various cardiovascular diseases [34,35]. It can be a key player in patients after cardiac surgery, when traditional longitudinal parameters (e.g.…”

Section: Wwwcardiologyjournalorgmentioning

confidence: 99%

Echocardiographic evaluation of right ventricular systolic function: The traditional and innovative approach

Smolarek¹,

Gruchała

Sobiczewski

2017

Cardiol J.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Estimation of right ventricular (RV) performance still remains technically challenging due to its anatomical and functional distinctiveness. The current guidelines for the echocardiographic quantification of RV function recommend using multiple indices to describe the RV in a thorough and comprehensive manner, such as RV index of myocardial performance, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, fractional area change, Doppler tissue imaging-derived tricuspid lateral annular systolic velocity (S'-wave), three-dimensional RV ejection fraction (3D RVEF), RV longitudinal strain (RVLS)/strain rate by speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE). Among these, the last one mentioned here is an innovative and a particularly promising tool that yields more precise information about complex regional and global RV mechanics. STE was initially designed to evaluate left ventricular function, but recently it has been intro-duced to assess RV performance, which is difficult due to its unique structure and physiology. Many studies have shown that both free wall and 6-segment RVLS present a stronger correlation with the RVEF assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance than conventional parameters and seem to be more sensitive in detecting myocardial dysfunction at an earlier, subclinical stage. (Cardiol J 2017; 24, 5: 563-572)

show abstract

“…Assessment of RV volume and ejection fraction by MDCT has been shown to correlate well with CMR (Table 1). [14][15][16][17] It is important to note that the evaluation of RV by MDCT can be limited by inadequate contrast opacification, resulting in problems with accurate delineation of RV contours. It has been reported that RV cannot be accurately assessed by MDCT in as many as 5 to 17% of studies.18 When accurate delineation of RV contours is necessary, biphasic or triphasic contrast protocols with a saline and contrast chaser mixture can be used.…”

Section: Right Ventricle (Evaluation Of Volume and Function)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Beyond the Coronary Arteries: Evolving Applications of Multi-detector Cardiac Computed Tomography in the Assessment of Non-coronary Structures

Xu¹,

Seneviratne²,

Nasis³

2016

ICFJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

<p>Beyond the assessment of coronary artery anatomy, multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) can be used to provide detailed structural evaluation of multiple non-coronary structures. The purpose of this review is to provide a clinical update on the evolving niche applications of MDCT in the assessment of non-coronary structures, including the assessment of the left ventricle for perfusion and scar, the evaluation of the right ventricle, pericardium and coronary anomalies. Additionally, the roles of MDCT in the assessment of congenital heart disease and intra-cardiac masses will be reviewed.</p>

show abstract

Multimodality Comparison of Quantitative Volumetric Analysis of the Right Ventricle

Cited by 243 publications

References 22 publications

Use of novel echocardiographic techniques to assess right ventricular geometry and function

Use of novel echocardiographic techniques to assess right ventricular geometry and function

Echocardiographic evaluation of right ventricular systolic function: The traditional and innovative approach

Beyond the Coronary Arteries: Evolving Applications of Multi-detector Cardiac Computed Tomography in the Assessment of Non-coronary Structures

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About