Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Applied Perception 2015
DOI: 10.1145/2804408.2804420
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multimodal perception of material properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in reality, humans often use multiple senses to judge material properties of objects. Previous literature has shown that inputs from multiple senses often interact during material perception (Bonneel, Suied, Viaud-Delmon, & Drettakis, 2010;Buckingham, Cant, & Goodale, 2009;Fujisaki, Goda, Motoyoshi, Komatsu, & Nishida, 2014;Fujisaki, Tokita, & Kariya, 2015;Martín, Iseringhausen, Weinmann, & Hullin, 2015;Tiest & Kappers, 2007). The majority of multisensory studies of human material perception have focused on measuring one or certain specific attributes, such as surface roughness (Tiest & Kappers, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in reality, humans often use multiple senses to judge material properties of objects. Previous literature has shown that inputs from multiple senses often interact during material perception (Bonneel, Suied, Viaud-Delmon, & Drettakis, 2010;Buckingham, Cant, & Goodale, 2009;Fujisaki, Goda, Motoyoshi, Komatsu, & Nishida, 2014;Fujisaki, Tokita, & Kariya, 2015;Martín, Iseringhausen, Weinmann, & Hullin, 2015;Tiest & Kappers, 2007). The majority of multisensory studies of human material perception have focused on measuring one or certain specific attributes, such as surface roughness (Tiest & Kappers, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the second activity, participants were able to interact in a free-way. At the end of each condition, participants answered the User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ) 1 [22] and the sensory experience questionnaire 2 [19,24]. To compute the questionnaire scores, we scored each item using a scale from -3 to +3, and we calculated the average score for all the items.…”
Section: Pilot Study: Potential Differences Between Rigid and Elastic Displaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A high degree of consistency between these two assignments was detected, indicating that they facilitate one another by accessing the same perceptual information. The multisensory nature of the communication of material qualities has been further explored by Martín et al [18], where the authors employed contact and stroking material sounds to complement the visual stimuli. Their results demonstrate the strong linkage between the auditory channel and the haptic perception to a point in which sound is capable of biasing the visual judgment of concrete qualities.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a logical consequence is desirable to enhance the digital material with additional cues on top of the purely visual user experience. In this regard, auditory cues and sonification techniques have demonstrated to influence significantly the perception of a © 2018 Copyright held by the owner/author (s) product quality/efficiency [22], compensate the absence of tactile interaction with digital material samples [18] and increase the feeling of immersion w.r.t. the unimodal visual experience [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%