2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11165-020-09977-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multimodal Interaction Analysis: a Powerful Tool for Examining Plurilingual Students’ Engagement in Science Practices

Abstract: Science teaching and learning are discursive practices, yet analysis of these practices has frequently been grounded in theorizations that place language at the forefront of interaction and meaning-making. Such language-centric analytic approaches risk overlooking key embodied, enacted aspects of students’ engagement in science practices. This manuscript presents a case of a plurilingual student’s participation in science inquiry to demonstrate how multimodal interaction analysis can be used to examine the hig… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(31 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For both cases, the codes were generated by viewing the embodiments of science ideas several times, focusing mostly at first on the actions and then considering the actions and any associated dialogue or narration as well as interactions among the actors and audience. This allowed us to foreground embodied engagement, similar to Wilmes and Siry (2021) who reduced the “bias inherent in language‐centric [methodological] approaches” (p. 74) by focusing on the students' actions, while also overlaying additional meaning of the embodiments as communicated in speech.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…For both cases, the codes were generated by viewing the embodiments of science ideas several times, focusing mostly at first on the actions and then considering the actions and any associated dialogue or narration as well as interactions among the actors and audience. This allowed us to foreground embodied engagement, similar to Wilmes and Siry (2021) who reduced the “bias inherent in language‐centric [methodological] approaches” (p. 74) by focusing on the students' actions, while also overlaying additional meaning of the embodiments as communicated in speech.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This use of plurilingual to describe people, and multilingual to describe spaces is in accordance with the Council of Europe's ( 2018 ) position on plurilingualism. Thus, in our work we explore the resources plurilingual students in Luxembourg employ in multilingual classroom spaces (e.g., Wilmes and Siry 2021 ). Positioning students as plurilingual provides us with a lens on the diverse, multimodal resources they employ in classrooms (Wilmes, Siry, Gómez Fernández, Gorges 2018 ).…”
Section: Methodology Participants and Analytical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In light of the limitations of the above research, the effect presented by multi-modal interactive technology is not enough to satisfy people. There is still a distinct difference from the ideal state, which objectively hinders the combination with its landscape environment [ 45 ]. The emergence of tools is necessary to meet people’s needs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%