Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Learning Analytics &Amp; Knowledge - LAK '16 2016
DOI: 10.1145/2883851.2883877
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multimodal analytics to study collaborative problem solving in pair programming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our case, these features highly correlate with the quality of the students' artefacts in project‐based learning. These results align with existing research on PBL activities that show the value of nonverbal indexes of student interaction in estimating their success at learning processes (Cukurova, Luckin, Millan, & Mavrikis, ) as well as MMLA research findings that show the potential of hand motion and speed, and the location of the learners to predict student success at various learning outcomes (Blikstein, ; Ochoa et al, ; Grover et al, ). As mentioned in Section 2, there are three main aspects of PBL: students are asking driving questions, doing investigations to answer these questions, and collaborate together to solve these questions (Krajcik, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In our case, these features highly correlate with the quality of the students' artefacts in project‐based learning. These results align with existing research on PBL activities that show the value of nonverbal indexes of student interaction in estimating their success at learning processes (Cukurova, Luckin, Millan, & Mavrikis, ) as well as MMLA research findings that show the potential of hand motion and speed, and the location of the learners to predict student success at various learning outcomes (Blikstein, ; Ochoa et al, ; Grover et al, ). As mentioned in Section 2, there are three main aspects of PBL: students are asking driving questions, doing investigations to answer these questions, and collaborate together to solve these questions (Krajcik, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Moreover, Ochoa and colleagues' () work used existing multimedia processing technologies to produce a set of features for accurate predictions of experts in groups of students solving math problems, which illustrated the benefits of MMLA to support students' learning in these contexts. Similarly, Chen and colleagues () expanded from the oral presentation quality data corpus to further examine the feasibility of using multimodal technologies for the assessing of public speaking skills; Grover and colleagues () explored how to develop computational models of social learning environments. In their work, Grover and colleagues () managed to classify the quality of collaboration from body movement and gestures of pair programmers working together with acceptable accuracy rates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A significant amount of work has been done using a combination of data streams to predict collaborative processes or learning outcomes (Stewart, Keirn, & D'Mello, 2018;Zhang et al, 2019). For the collaborative process, researchers have used data streams such as audio, video, logs, Kinect and physiological measures to predict features of the collaboration including coordination, dialog acts and idea generation (Ezen-Can, Grafsgaard, Lester, & Boyer, 2015;Furuichi & Worsley, 2018;Grafsgaard, Duran, Randall, Tao, & D'Mello, 2018;Grover et al, 2016;Liu & Stamper, 2017;Malmberg et al, 2019;Stewart et al, 2018;Viswanathan & VanLehn, 2017a;Worsley, 2018). In terms of learning, audio, video and logs have been used both to predict learning gains (Schneider & Blikstein, 2015) and for model refinement (Liu, Davenport, & Stamper, 2016).…”
Section: Practitioner Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A classical pre/posttest approach in a controlled setting would not provide an authentic assessment of collaborative engagement. Rather, it must be assessed as development in progress [11].…”
Section: Background 21 Learner Engagementmentioning
confidence: 99%