2022
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.202270122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multimicrochannel Microneedle Microporation Platform for Enhanced Intracellular Drug Delivery (Adv. Funct. Mater. 21/2022)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For better adaptation to the purpose of drug delivery within the gastric wall, sufficient mechanical strength of the LGP‐MN is necessary to ensure its effective penetration into the gastric wall and drug delivery to a specific depth. [ 36 ] Compression test shows an ~35 µm needle‐tip displacement under a 0.56 N compressive force corresponding to the 3.183 MPa skin‐penetration pressure, which is an unobservable deformation in all three types of LGP‐MNs [ 37 ] (Figure 2B; Figures S3 and S4A, Supporting Information). The flexibility of the LGP‐MN was tested, and the results showed a maximum flexure of >30% (≈30°), satisfying the surface flexure of the stomach (Figure 2C and Figure S4B, Supporting Information).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For better adaptation to the purpose of drug delivery within the gastric wall, sufficient mechanical strength of the LGP‐MN is necessary to ensure its effective penetration into the gastric wall and drug delivery to a specific depth. [ 36 ] Compression test shows an ~35 µm needle‐tip displacement under a 0.56 N compressive force corresponding to the 3.183 MPa skin‐penetration pressure, which is an unobservable deformation in all three types of LGP‐MNs [ 37 ] (Figure 2B; Figures S3 and S4A, Supporting Information). The flexibility of the LGP‐MN was tested, and the results showed a maximum flexure of >30% (≈30°), satisfying the surface flexure of the stomach (Figure 2C and Figure S4B, Supporting Information).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 1–4 ] Historically, microinjection protocols have relied on using a single hollow microneedle to deliver target substances (e.g., cells, DNA, RNA, micro/nanoparticles) to a singular location of interest. [ 5–7 ] Recently, however, alternatives in the form of microneedle arrays (MNAs) have garnered increasing interest due to a wide range of benefits over their single‐needle counterparts, including the ability to rapidly deliver target material over a large, distributed area, which has proven to be particularly beneficial for transdermal and intradermal drug delivery. [ 8–11 ] Despite the significant potential of MNAs for microinjection applications, the majority of current MNA developments are founded on solid (e.g., coated and/or dissolvable) microneedles that are inherently incompatible with active fluidic microinjection protocols.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the rapid development of intrinsically stretchable organic semiconductor materials, especially organic polymers, has encouraged the potential of OTFTs as skin-like sensors. [5][6][7][8] However, conventional OTFTs must overcome their low-temperature sensitivity and electrical instability under strain to be adopted as skin-like temperature sensors. [9][10][11] In addition, their high operating voltage should be lowered to reduce power consumption, given the limited capacity of rechargeable batteries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%