2017
DOI: 10.3150/15-bej764
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multilevel path simulation for weak approximation schemes with application to Lévy-driven SDEs

Abstract: In this paper we discuss the possibility of using multilevel Monte Carlo (MLMC) methods for weak approximation schemes. It turns out that by means of a simple coupling between consecutive time discretisation levels, one can achieve the same complexity gain as under the presence of a strong convergence. We exemplify this general idea in the case of weak Euler scheme for Lévy driven stochastic differential equations, and show that, given a weak convergence of order α ≥ 1/2, the complexity of the corresponding "w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…is satisfied, is studied in Belomestny and Nagapetyan [2]. Recall that (15) is violated in our construction, except in trivial cases, see (6).…”
Section: A Random Bit Multilevel Algorithm In This Section We Considmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…is satisfied, is studied in Belomestny and Nagapetyan [2]. Recall that (15) is violated in our construction, except in trivial cases, see (6).…”
Section: A Random Bit Multilevel Algorithm In This Section We Considmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, 2 q }, yields a much larger number of pairwise independent random variables with the same uniform distribution. The number of random bits used by the algorithm A Bbit ε is of the order ε −2 • (ln(ε −1 )) 5/2 , see the proof of Theorem 8, and it can be reduced further to ε −2 • (ln(ε −1 )) 2 • ln(ln(ε −1 )), as outlined in Remark 9. Since the upper bound in (1) is sharp, the number of random bits is asymptotically negligible compared to the overall cost of A Bbit ε .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [1] Belomestny and Nagapetyan introduced the Weak MLMC method, proving that MLMC based on the weak Euler scheme maintains C = O(ε −2 (log ε) 2 ) when doing the right coupling of levels. Concretely, for an arbitrary level l, let ξ f l,i and ξ c l,i , i = 1, .…”
Section: Weak Mlmcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• the Euler MLMC method with binomial random variables introduced by Belomestny and Nagapetyan [1] (Euler),…”
Section: Numerical Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…, m L−1 }. Maybe these restrictions could be relaxed when replacing the Brownian increments in the Euler schemes by Rademacher random variables like in the weak MLMC method introduced by Belomestny and Nagapetyan [2]. Nonetheless the derivation of concentration bounds for the weak MLMC estimators would require a different approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%