Multilevel networks for climate change adaptation – what works?

Abstract

If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors service information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all. Please visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information. About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.comEmerald is a global publisher linking research and practice to the benefit of society. The company manages a portfolio of more than 290 journals and over 2,350 books and book series volumes, as well as providing an extensive range of online products and additional customer resources and services.Emerald is both COUNTER 4 and TRANSFER compliant. The organization is a partner of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and also works with Portico and the LOCKSS initiative for digital archive preservation.*Related content and download information correct at time of download. Design/methodology/approach -The findings are based on 12 qualitative interviews taken from two case studies, and the results are explained in relation to the multilevel network framework and environmental psychology.Findings -Multilevel networks can promote learning and identification of specific actions in connection with climate change adaptation. The aim should be to establish interdisciplinarity, with participants from at least two authority levels. Representatives should be in positions that enable them to introduce acquired knowledge to the organization and influence its application. A network requires organizational commitment, during the initial phase and throughout the follow-up process. Municipal leaders (mayors) must be aware of the network, act as signatories to relevant documents, and be familiar with participating representatives. Commitment to knowledge application within the organization also requires that participants understand where and how to work strategically to convert new ideas into action.Practical implications -This paper presents practical and research-based guidelines for the management of climate change adaptation networks at municipal, county and national authority levels.Originality/value -This paper combines political science and environmental psychology perspectives as a means of analysing network achievements. A psychological approach may help to promote a greater understanding of why and how network knowledge is transferred.

Urban Heritage Facility Management: A Scoping Review

“…Enhancement of citizens' participation in governing and development processes is important for the higher achievement of SDGs [43]. From that perspective, co-financing is in line with the publicprivate-people-partnership (PPPP) model [22], co-owning with the personal perception of responsibility and attachment to the public domain [44,45], and co-creation with the collaborative governance approach resulting in the creation of quality public spaces that contribute to people's well-being [46]. Urban FM stayed as an under-studied FM feature due to the multiple overlapping elements, including urban planning, urban gentrification, urban management, and urban sustainability [9,13,41,47].…”

Becoming urban: the emergence of an urban policy in rural Norway

“…One of the main outcomes from the 'future cities' network was increased knowledge. For example, from the 'Climate Adaptation Troms' network, being a multilevel network, came an increased awareness among the municipal actors of what the other public authorities could offer them (knowledge, competence, support) (Hauge et al 2018;Hanssen et al 2015).…”

Joint knowledge production in climate change adaptation networks

“…Along the same lines as the practice-oriented networks, albeit being guided by policy objectives, are networks as enablers of policy processes and action toward adaptation [32]. These networks are initiated as collaborations amongst science, policy, and practice to inform policy and policy processes and to support the development and implementation of adaptation at the national and subnational level.…”