1997
DOI: 10.1134/1.1130208
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multilevel interaction between layers in layered film structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the trilayer samples A and B, the contribution of the different mechanisms to the interaction between FeNi layers is dependent on the non‐magnetic‐spacer thickness. These mechanisms include the exchange interaction, the “orange peel” magnetic interaction and the magnetostatic interaction conveyed by “magnetization ripples” 15. The regular magnetic domain patterns observed in multilayered sample C could imply the reduction of the effectiveness of these mechanisms (due to smoother interfaces or an averaging out of the interactions) or the prevalence of other mechanisms as the magnetostatic interaction between layers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the trilayer samples A and B, the contribution of the different mechanisms to the interaction between FeNi layers is dependent on the non‐magnetic‐spacer thickness. These mechanisms include the exchange interaction, the “orange peel” magnetic interaction and the magnetostatic interaction conveyed by “magnetization ripples” 15. The regular magnetic domain patterns observed in multilayered sample C could imply the reduction of the effectiveness of these mechanisms (due to smoother interfaces or an averaging out of the interactions) or the prevalence of other mechanisms as the magnetostatic interaction between layers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is logical to suppose that the domain walls situated in different magnetic layers form magnetic structures with a closed or partially closed magnetic flux. Such a structure formation can be associated with a decrease of the energy density corresponding to the domain wall and as a consequence results in a decrease of the coercivity [3,12].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This layer of the small thickness may have a lack of magnetic anisotropy to prevent magnetization reversal layer permalloy, or even be magnetically disordered. Based on the dependence (L), one can assume that antiferromagnetism in the FeMn layer is present, but weakens in process decrease L. Otherwise, the existence of the paramagnetic layer between the ferromagnetic layers should lead to significantly lower values of H [5].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%