Multilevel governance and management of shared stocks with integrated markets: The European anchovy case

Mulazzani, Luca; Curtin, Richard; Andrés, Marga; Malorgio, Giulio

doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2012.06.020

Cited by 16 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…We showed that the governance system of forest recreation in Switzerland is a multi-tier one, similar to the findings of Mulazzani et al (2013), who characterized fisheries as being multi-level. The IAD framework helps to better understand the governance processes of forest recreation, at least in countries facing similar conditions to those described in this paper, as it directs the focus to context factors that frame action situations for such processes on different scales.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 84%

“…Nevertheless, describing context factors is a necessary precondition for comprehensively framing governance systems and identifying both action situations and crucial governance challenges (Koontz, 2005;Clement, 2010;Thiele et al, 2011;Mulazzani et al, 2013). However, these context factors are usually well established and can only be changed over long periods.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The three main fields of application are: (1) fisheries, for example to investigate common property arrangements (Mulazzani et al, 2013), to analyse governance (McGinnis, 2011b;Beitl, 2011;Fidelman et al, 2012) and to survey ecosystem-based fisheries (Rudd, 2004); (2) forestry, for example to study forest management (Sekher, 2001;Clement, 2010;Mehring et al, 2011) and to analyse forest governance (Andersson, 2006;Clement and Amezaga, 2008;Coleman and Steed, 2009); and (3) water, for example to investigate water management (Imperial, 1999;Mokhtar et al, 2011;Toriman et al, 2012), to research watershed partnership (Hardy and Koontz, 2009) and to survey water policy-making (Koontz, 2005). The three main fields of application are: (1) fisheries, for example to investigate common property arrangements (Mulazzani et al, 2013), to analyse governance (McGinnis, 2011b;Beitl, 2011;Fidelman et al, 2012) and to survey ecosystem-based fisheries (Rudd, 2004); (2) forestry, for example to study forest management (Sekher, 2001;Clement, 2010;Mehring et al, 2011) and to analyse forest governance (Andersson, 2006;Clement and Amezaga, 2008;Coleman and Steed, 2009); and (3) water, for example to investigate water management (Imperial, 1999;Mokhtar et al, 2011;Toriman et al, 2012), to research watershed partnership (Hardy and Koontz, 2009) and to survey water policy-making (Koontz, 2005).…”

Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The IAD framework has been applied in many empirical studies. The three main fields of application are: (1) fisheries, for example to investigate common property arrangements (Mulazzani et al, 2013), to analyse governance (McGinnis, 2011b;Beitl, 2011;Fidelman et al, 2012) and to survey ecosystem-based fisheries (Rudd, 2004); (2) forestry, for example to study forest management (Sekher, 2001;Clement, 2010;Mehring et al, 2011) and to analyse forest governance (Andersson, 2006;Clement and Amezaga, 2008;Coleman and Steed, 2009); and (3) water, for example to investigate water management (Imperial, 1999;Mokhtar et al, 2011;Toriman et al, 2012), to research watershed partnership (Hardy and Koontz, 2009) and to survey water policy-making (Koontz, 2005). Further fields of application include agriculture (Thiele et al, 2011) and social policy (Hill and Hupe, 2006).…”

Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Governance of Forest Recreation in Urban Areas: Analysing the role of stakeholders and institutions using the institutional analysis and development framework

2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Among the different functions forests offer, recreation is increasing in importance to a growing global population. This is at a time when multifunctional forest management can no longer cover its costs solely from the revenue from wood production. The governance of forest recreation is assumed to be different from that of other forest functions but is poorly understood, which limits proper forest management. Meanwhile, conflicting interactions between forest users are increasing. In this paper, we study forest recreation governance with a particular focus on forests in urban areas in developed countries. The paper first identifies key governance challenges for forest recreation and then provides a better understanding of forest recreation governance, focusing on the role of stakeholders and institutions. This is done using the Institutional Analysis and Development framework. We use urban forest areas of Switzerland to illustrate and exemplify the developments in forest recreation and their consequences for forest governance. The study draws on different empirical sources and analysis techniques, including statistical data, focus groups and document analyses. The findings show that six main action situations need to be considered when analysing forest recreation governance. In each action situation, several stakeholders are involved. We argue that understanding the governance of forest recreation is one of the future challenges in forest management and planning, particularly in urban areas. Finally, our study shows that the applied framework is appropriate and useful in analysing the structure and arrangements of forest recreation governance.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 84%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Governance of Forest Recreation in Urban Areas: Analysing the role of stakeholders and institutions using the institutional analysis and development framework

2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A communal fishing area, similar to the North Sea, would be obtained if Italy establishes a fishing protection zone to the midpoint division line. Management decisions based on transferable concessions should be easier to implement under this Community framework than under a regional fishery body such as the GFCM (a comparison between the management frameworks existing in the Adriatic Sea and in the Bay of Biscay for the anchovy fisheries is discussed in Mulazzani et al [2013]). However, the GFCM must be the basic institution for the management of straddling stocks shared with third countries.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Regional management of multi-species fisheries on the basis of shared stocks and property rights: a Mediterranean case

Mulazzani¹,

Malorgio²

2013

Sci. Mar.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

SUMMARY: Fishery management is a complicated task that often results in overfishing, overcapacity, and low profits for the industry. The management of shared fish stocks is particularly problematic, especially if national authorities pursue different objectives. Multi-species fisheries add further complexity to the problem. It is no accident that management tools frequently used in Northern Europe, such as total allowable catches and individual quotas, are not applied in the Mediterranean Sea, where more target species are caught simultaneously. However, the European Commission intends to introduce a market-based driver for a strong, profitable fishing industry by phasing in transferable fishing concessions. This management approach is new for the Mediterranean, and it requires in-depth examination at institutional, legal, and economic levels. In this paper, after a review of the institutional setting, the economic perspective was analyzed by estimating the production function for the Italian small pelagic fishery in the Adriatic Sea. With the addition of Croatia to the European Union, the Adriatic Sea can become a Mediterranean communal exclusive fishing area. The results indicate that output measures such as total allowable catches and individual quotas should not cause serious discarding problems for this multi-species fishery.

show abstract

Substituting hake with sardines? Economic crisis and fish demand in Spain

2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The main objective of this paper is to investigate the existence of an economic crisis-induced demand shift in the Spanish fish market. This is performed by endogenously examining whether the existence of a structural break in fish price trends around 2008, corresponding to the collapse of the Spanish economy, together with an asymmetric and specific price behavior regarding the sign and magnitude of the expected income elasticities of three staple fish species (i.e., sardine, anchovy and hake). Our data corroborate not only the structural break hypothesis for rooted luxury and inferior fish species in the Spanish market but also an opposite price response after the break, which explains the increasing pressure on cheap fish demand and conversely the lower demand for expensive fish products. Results show consistency for all market levels analyzed (i.e., origin, wholesale and retail). [EconLit citations: C22, Q31].

show abstract

Multilevel governance and management of shared stocks with integrated markets: The European anchovy case

Cited by 16 publications

References 28 publications

Governance of Forest Recreation in Urban Areas: Analysing the role of stakeholders and institutions using the institutional analysis and development framework

Governance of Forest Recreation in Urban Areas: Analysing the role of stakeholders and institutions using the institutional analysis and development framework

Regional management of multi-species fisheries on the basis of shared stocks and property rights: a Mediterranean case

Substituting hake with sardines? Economic crisis and fish demand in Spain

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About