2011
DOI: 10.4324/9780203855263
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multilevel and Longitudinal Modeling with IBM SPSS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
400
0
18

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 366 publications
(419 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
400
0
18
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, Heck et al (2010) noted more sophisticated nested designs "are rapidly growing in their popularity and use" (p. 320), which will only exacerbate the issues outlined in this study. Hence, researchers should heavily weigh the trade-offs of experiment-wise Type I error inflation for unconditional and statistical power loss for conditional nested designs before utilizing them.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, Heck et al (2010) noted more sophisticated nested designs "are rapidly growing in their popularity and use" (p. 320), which will only exacerbate the issues outlined in this study. Hence, researchers should heavily weigh the trade-offs of experiment-wise Type I error inflation for unconditional and statistical power loss for conditional nested designs before utilizing them.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…However, nesting is advantageous in order to control for unique effects of a specific level of a nest on another level (e.g., schools on curriculum). There are also more sophisticated multi-level and longitudinal models based on these basic layouts (Heck, Thomas, & Tabata, 2010). However, there has been little discussion in the literature regarding the impact on the inflation of experiment-wise Type I error rates due to the hierarchical testing of treatment effects.…”
Section: Hierarchical Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This analysis failed to detect a significant difference ( X 2 = 1.97, df = 1, p = 0.16) between the two release groups, so we combined the groups for subsequent modelling purposes. In addition, fish that approached or passed the fishway were likely to do so more than once making the data not independent (Heck, Thoma, & Tabata, ); as such, we incorporated fish ID as a random effect in mixed effects regression models. We used backward model selection with Akaike's information criterion (AIC, Akaike, ) to objectively compare model fits and determine the most parsimonious model with the lowest AIC value.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hierarchical regression modelling was used to specify a hierarchical system of regression equations that takes advantage of the clustered data structure (Heck, Thomas, & Tabata, ; Hong & Chang, ). This procedure explains relations between ideal stream restoration features through image‐based surveys and the AHP data of individual residents representing six subwatersheds, as designed with a multilevel model to investigate a randomly varying intercept model.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%