2013
DOI: 10.1111/josh.12081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multilevel Analysis of the Impact of School‐Level Tobacco Policies on Adolescent Smoking: The Case of Michigan

Abstract: This study theoretically and methodologically guides researchers to test TFSP effectiveness in other states. Three strategic implications emerge: (1) schools should provide a consistent antismoking message in smoke-free environments; (2) schools should integrate TFSP into a comprehensive tobacco control initiative, including community-wide tobacco control programs and messages; and (3) the way a specific TFSP is promoted and communicated could determine how effective it is.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
32
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(135 reference statements)
0
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…School tobacco policies can influence schools' social environments (Paek, Hove, & Oh, 2013), but this could not be taken into consideration in this study. As well, although several school characteristics were measured in the survey, there was no comprehensive school connectedness measure.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…School tobacco policies can influence schools' social environments (Paek, Hove, & Oh, 2013), but this could not be taken into consideration in this study. As well, although several school characteristics were measured in the survey, there was no comprehensive school connectedness measure.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Paek et al 18 found that communicating smoking policies to students and staff may be important in making policies effective in practice. However, other studies did not support this conclusion 10 19.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some previous studies suggest that enforcement of policies by sanctioning students who violate non-smoking rules may be an effective strategy to reduce smoking prevalence 13 18 20–22. Other studies confirm that enforcement might reduce smoking rates, finding lower smoking rates in a school where there was stronger adherence to the smoking rules,23 monitoring smoking behaviour20 and staff perception of enforcement of smoking bans 24.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The structural power between teachers and students at school is, therefore, likely to prompt students to challenge any health imperative from the school's authority (e.g., looking for the loopholes in tobacco management; Cothran & Ennis, 1997; S. Lewis & Russell, 2013). This finding also helps to explain why previous studies identified the positive associations between teachers' smoking and student smoking (Galanti et al, 2014;Paek, Hove, & Oh, 2013;Sinha, Gupta, Dobe, & Prasad, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…As reported by students and informants, some well-reported functions of smoking such as an academic stress coping strategy might be also learnt by social osmosis (e.g., media, social interactions) from wider society (Davey & Zhao, 2012b;Nichter et al, 2007;Zhao et al, 2017). Since the effectiveness of school-based smoking interventions hinge on the social environment outside of schools, aggressive and comprehensive anti-smoking policies in wider society should be implemented (Au, Ma, Zhu, Chen, & Tang, 2016;Paek et al, 2013;L. Wang et al, 2017;G.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%