2010
DOI: 10.1137/060650799
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multilevel Algorithms for Large-Scale Interior Point Methods

Abstract: Abstract. We develop and compare multilevel algorithms for solving bound constrained nonlinear variational problems via interior point methods. Several equivalent formulations of the linear systems arising at each iteration of the interior point method are compared from the point of view of conditioning and iterative solution. Furthermore, we show how a multilevel continuation strategy can be used to obtain good initial guesses ("hot starts") for each nonlinear iteration. A minimal surface problem is used to i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With a proper block partitioning, K 3 can be cast into a KKT formulation as well. Under our assumptions on H and J , and as long as X and Z are diagonal with positive entries, K 2 and K 3 are nonsingular; K 2 has n positive and m negative eigenvalues, while K 3 has n positive and n + m negative eigenvalues, see, e.g., , Lemma 4.1], , Lemma 3.5, 3.8]. The distinctive feature of these two matrices is their behavior in the limit of the IP procedure.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With a proper block partitioning, K 3 can be cast into a KKT formulation as well. Under our assumptions on H and J , and as long as X and Z are diagonal with positive entries, K 2 and K 3 are nonsingular; K 2 has n positive and m negative eigenvalues, while K 3 has n positive and n + m negative eigenvalues, see, e.g., , Lemma 4.1], , Lemma 3.5, 3.8]. The distinctive feature of these two matrices is their behavior in the limit of the IP procedure.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Interior Point (IP) methods are effective iterative procedures for solving linear, quadratic, and nonlinear programming problems, possibly of very large dimension, see and references therein. Because they are second‐order methods, a linear algebra phase constitutes their computational core, and its practical implementation is crucial for the efficiency of the overall optimization procedure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Naturally these objective function and constraints involve many parameters and the experts may assign them different values ( [1,2,3,4]). After the publication of the Dantzig and Wolfe decomposition method [7], there have been numerous subsequent works on large scale linear and nonlinear programming problems with block angular structure ( [1,6,12]). Abo Sinna et al [4] extended the technique for order preference by similarity ideal solution (TOPSIS) to solve multi-objective large scale non-linear programming problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…El-Sawy et al [9] introduced an algorithm for decomposing the parametric space in large scale linear vector optimization problems under fuzzy environment. Recently, notable studies have been done in the area of multi-level and multi-objective large scale programming problems ( [3,4,6,12]). Benzi et al [6] developed and compared multi-level algorithms for solving large scale bound constrained nonlinear problems via interior point methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation