2023
DOI: 10.1049/itr2.12382
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multilane freeway merging control via trajectory optimization in a mixed traffic environment

Abstract: Merging activities at freeway merging areas can cause significant recurrent and non‐recurrent bottleneck congestion due to vehicles’ mandatory lateral conflicts. The Connected and Automated Vehicles (CAVs), with their capabilities of real‐time communication and precise trajectory control, hold great potential to prevent or mitigate such critical conflicts at merging areas. However, the performance of CAVs may be impaired by the imbalance of lane flow distribution, and non‐cooperative movements of Human‐driven … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 64 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Data is collected at every simulation time step and aggregated to obtain the speed and density of each lane; the aggregated data is then used to determine how many vehicles would change lanes. These features and assumptions were verified in the V2I-based control of the previous studies [18,19]. In addition, a real-time Cooperative Intelligent Transport Systems service using V2I communication has been launched in Korea, so a short-cycle strategy is expected to be feasible.…”
Section: 11mentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Data is collected at every simulation time step and aggregated to obtain the speed and density of each lane; the aggregated data is then used to determine how many vehicles would change lanes. These features and assumptions were verified in the V2I-based control of the previous studies [18,19]. In addition, a real-time Cooperative Intelligent Transport Systems service using V2I communication has been launched in Korea, so a short-cycle strategy is expected to be feasible.…”
Section: 11mentioning
confidence: 60%