Multiple Primary Malignancies 2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-88-470-1095-6_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multifocal and Multicentric Tumors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in line with the data showing a difference in histology, pathologic grade, and receptor status at a higher percentage in patients with differing Oncotype Dx than in patients with similar Oncotype Dx. The possibility exists that the multiple primaries are actually a single primary with extension that is not able to be seen either radiographically or pathologically 20–22. If this were the case, one would expect to see correlation between distance between tumors and similarity of Oncotype Dx score, which was not the case in our analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is in line with the data showing a difference in histology, pathologic grade, and receptor status at a higher percentage in patients with differing Oncotype Dx than in patients with similar Oncotype Dx. The possibility exists that the multiple primaries are actually a single primary with extension that is not able to be seen either radiographically or pathologically 20–22. If this were the case, one would expect to see correlation between distance between tumors and similarity of Oncotype Dx score, which was not the case in our analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The possibility exists that the multiple primaries are actually a single primary with extension that is not able to be seen either radiographically or pathologically. [20][21][22] If this were the case, one would expect to see correlation between distance between tumors and similarity of Oncotype Dx score, which was not the case in our analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Multifocal tumours originate from a unique cellular clone and grow multifocally within a single organ, whilst multicentric tumours do not exhibit a clonal relationship, with respect to their carcinogenesis, yet they can develop simultaneously in more than one organ (de Werra ). The mechanism has yet to be fully elucidated; however, when deciding appropriate treatment or surgery for tumours of paired organs it is particularly important to consider if bilateral disease represents metastasis or results from genetic predisposition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metastasis in the present case is unlikely given absence of lymphovascular invasion in tissue sections examined and in the lungs. Multifocality and multicentricity are two somewhat confusing concepts in tumor development [ 7 ]. While multifocal tumors (typically due to local/regional metastasis) originate from a unique cellular clone and grow multifocally in a single organ, multicentric tumors develop simultaneously in more than one organ but without a clonal relationship with respect to their carcinogenesis [ 7 ].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multifocality and multicentricity are two somewhat confusing concepts in tumor development [ 7 ]. While multifocal tumors (typically due to local/regional metastasis) originate from a unique cellular clone and grow multifocally in a single organ, multicentric tumors develop simultaneously in more than one organ but without a clonal relationship with respect to their carcinogenesis [ 7 ]. Therapeutic response differences may exist between single (unicentric), multicentric and multiple (regional metastatic) tumors [ 7 ].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%