2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10237-017-0960-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multifidelity-CMA: a multifidelity approach for efficient personalisation of 3D cardiac electromechanical models

Abstract: Personalised computational models of the heart are of increasing interest for clinical applications due to their discriminative and predictive abilities. However, the simulation of a single heartbeat with a 3D cardiac electromechanical model can be long and computationally expensive, which makes some practical applications, such as the estimation of model parameters from clinical data (the personalisation), very slow. Here we introduce an original multifidelity approach between a 3D cardiac model and a simplif… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(49 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cardiac model we use is a fast “0D” model, which we introduced in Molléro et al It is a reduced version of our in‐house 3D electromechanical model, based on the implementation of the Bestel‐Clement‐Sorine (BCS) model by Marchesseau et al() in SOFA . As described in Molléro et al, both the 3D and 0D models share the same mechanical and haemodynamic equations, but simplifying assumptions (see Appendix B) is made on the geometry of the 0D model. This leads to a very fast model made of 18 equations, which can simulate 15 beats per second at a heart rate of 75 bpm.…”
Section: Results On 137 Complete Cases and Application To Parameter Smentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The cardiac model we use is a fast “0D” model, which we introduced in Molléro et al It is a reduced version of our in‐house 3D electromechanical model, based on the implementation of the Bestel‐Clement‐Sorine (BCS) model by Marchesseau et al() in SOFA . As described in Molléro et al, both the 3D and 0D models share the same mechanical and haemodynamic equations, but simplifying assumptions (see Appendix B) is made on the geometry of the 0D model. This leads to a very fast model made of 18 equations, which can simulate 15 beats per second at a heart rate of 75 bpm.…”
Section: Results On 137 Complete Cases and Application To Parameter Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To tackle this and the 3D model, we believe that a possibility would be to use the personalisation in a reduced subspace of 0D model parameters (such as ) to influence the estimation of a 3D model. Another possibility could be to investigate the use of specific 0D/3D multifidelity parameter couplings as presented in Molléro et al for multiple iterations of the IUP algorithm at once to lower the burden of repeated personalisations. We believe this could enable the use of the IUP algorithm on databases of 100 to 200 cases with the 3D model in around 4 to 5 days.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CMA-ES is a gradient-free method whose relevance was demonstrated for the personalization of complex models as in cardiac electromechanical simulations [11]. Besides, this generic personalization strategy allows to remain non-specific to a given model.…”
Section: Personalization Of the Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, a Levenberg‐Marquardt‐based optimization uses evaluations switching between a 3D FOM, a coarsely discretized version of the 3D FOM, and a 2D surrogate model. Another multifidelity approach was used in Reference between a 3D FOM and a 0D surrogate model. An evolutionary algorithm was used in Reference using a ROM with a pre‐computed POD‐basis from a single FOM to identify four parameters of an electrophysiological cardiac model from a synthetic electrocardiogram.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%