2020
DOI: 10.1002/cnm.3320
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using parametric model order reduction for inverse analysis of large nonlinear cardiac simulations

Abstract: Predictive high-fidelity finite element simulations of human cardiac mechanics commonly require a large number of structural degrees of freedom. Additionally, these models are often coupled with lumped-parameter models of hemodynamics. High computational demands, however, slow down model calibration and therefore limit the use of cardiac simulations in clinical practice. As cardiac models rely on several patient-specific parameters, just one solution corresponding to one specific parameter set does not at all … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We refer, e.g., to [ 30 , 31 ] and [ 32 ] for applications of POD to parabolic and fluid problems, respectively, and [ 31 ] for [ 30 ] for a comprehensive study of the properties of POD when applied to the solution of Ordinary Differential Equations (ODEs). In the context of cardiac simulations, this technique has been successfully employed both in fluid (e.g., in [ 33 ] to simulate blood flow in patient-specific coronary artery bypass grafts) and structural simulations (e.g., in [ 34 ], where POD is used to reduce the space of admissible displacements of the heart muscle). In the POD approach, the reduced basis is usually constructed by singular value decomposition (SVD) [ 35 , 36 ] out of the set of snapshots, which are obtained by sampling N s parameters in and by solving the corresponding FOM.…”
Section: The Reduced Basis Methods In a Nutshellmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We refer, e.g., to [ 30 , 31 ] and [ 32 ] for applications of POD to parabolic and fluid problems, respectively, and [ 31 ] for [ 30 ] for a comprehensive study of the properties of POD when applied to the solution of Ordinary Differential Equations (ODEs). In the context of cardiac simulations, this technique has been successfully employed both in fluid (e.g., in [ 33 ] to simulate blood flow in patient-specific coronary artery bypass grafts) and structural simulations (e.g., in [ 34 ], where POD is used to reduce the space of admissible displacements of the heart muscle). In the POD approach, the reduced basis is usually constructed by singular value decomposition (SVD) [ 35 , 36 ] out of the set of snapshots, which are obtained by sampling N s parameters in and by solving the corresponding FOM.…”
Section: The Reduced Basis Methods In a Nutshellmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in [3] to simulate blood flow in patient-specific coronary artery bypass grafts) and structural simulations (e.g. in [46], where POD is used to reduce the space of admissible displacements of the heart muscle). In the POD approach, the reduced basis is usually constructed by singular value decomposition (SVD) [26,56] out of the set of snapshots, which are obtained by sampling N s parameters µ 1 , .…”
Section: The Offline Phase: Basis Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dependencies on the parameter set μ can be incorporated through subspace interpolation. Several subspace interpolation methods were compared in Pfaller et al for cardiac problems with varying maximum active tension of cardiac muscle fibers σ 0 , which is a key determinant of cardiac function. The best approximation was achieved in Pfaller et al with the weighted concatenation method.…”
Section: Projection‐based Model Order Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several subspace interpolation methods were compared in Pfaller et al for cardiac problems with varying maximum active tension of cardiac muscle fibers σ 0 , which is a key determinant of cardiac function. The best approximation was achieved in Pfaller et al with the weighted concatenation method. In a scenario with K sample points of previous FOM evaluations, the matrix V ( μ ∗ ) is constructed at a new parameter set μ ∗ by considering the first q left singular vectors of the (weighted and) concatenated snapshot matrix alignleftalign-1D(μ)=w1(μ)D(μ1),,wK(μ)D(μK),align-2 based on snapshots D ( μ i ) with weights w i at sample point i .…”
Section: Projection‐based Model Order Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%