1977
DOI: 10.1021/ac50012a032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multielement detection limits and sample nebulization efficiencies of an improved ultrasonic nebulizer and a conventional pneumatic nebulizer in inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
56
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 210 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The detection limits improved compared to Set 2 (pneumatic nebulization) conditions by a factor of ten. The main reason for the improvement was a large increase in analyte signal resulting from the high efficiency of ultrasonic nebulization [22][23][24]. The overall background intensity remained roughly the same.…”
Section: Comparison Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The detection limits improved compared to Set 2 (pneumatic nebulization) conditions by a factor of ten. The main reason for the improvement was a large increase in analyte signal resulting from the high efficiency of ultrasonic nebulization [22][23][24]. The overall background intensity remained roughly the same.…”
Section: Comparison Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…As already quoted in the earlier literature concerning USN-ICP-AES [2][3][4][5] differences in matrix composition between standards and samples may often lead to changes in efficiency of aerosol formation and transport but they are also responsible for different evolution of phenomena occurring in the plasma itself. These drawbacks are also observed using conventional pneumatic nebulizers but they are less pronounced and may be more easily controlled during the analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…of the sample that is transferred to droplets by a nebulizer such as an ultrasonic nebulizer. 12,13) Mistral Desolvation (MD) is the sample introduction method in which the heating-cooling process is applied to the primary droplets sprayed by a nebulizer with which a solvent is removed by selective evaporation and condensation so that the sensitivity can be improved by several times as compared with conventional methods.…”
Section: Sensitivity Improvement Mechanism Of the Mistral Desolvatingmentioning
confidence: 99%