2020
DOI: 10.21037/tlcr.2019.11.33
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multidisciplinary team care in advanced lung cancer

Abstract: Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer mortality globally. A vast majority of lung cancer cases are diagnosed at advanced stages. Management of advanced lung cancer requires several diagnostic and therapeutic procedures provided by various specialists. To optimise the entire diagnostic and therapeutic process, a concept of care provided simultaneously by a multidisciplinary team (MDT) has been developed and implemented in specialised centres worldwide. Observational studies suggest that integrated and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Health governance studies on LC management suggest that integrated and multidisciplinary care reduces barriers to treatment and variation in care, improves adherence to clinical guidelines, staging, and care coordination. This strategy also significantly shortens the interval from diagnosis to treatment, and ultimately leads to a better patient experience and an increase in the quality of care for LC patients [8,9]. This review is based on previously conducted studies and does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Health governance studies on LC management suggest that integrated and multidisciplinary care reduces barriers to treatment and variation in care, improves adherence to clinical guidelines, staging, and care coordination. This strategy also significantly shortens the interval from diagnosis to treatment, and ultimately leads to a better patient experience and an increase in the quality of care for LC patients [8,9]. This review is based on previously conducted studies and does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fourth, previous studies suggested that MDT care and treatment could significantly increase the accuracy of diagnosis, shorten the duration from diagnosis to treatment, and finally bring survival benefits to cancer patients. 26 , 27 In our case, after confirming a massive primary lesion with liver metastasis through CT-abdomen, the MDT discussion and treatment was initiated. Subsequently, a satisfactory therapeutic result was achieved through MDT efforts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Despite the CCDSS enhancing case-relevant information for lung cancer staging and treatment selection, professionals doubted if the MDTM workflows would benefit from this system (CFIR: Characteristics of Individuals). However, previous literature suggested room for improvement in care efficacy of lung cancer MDTMS as 16% of patients failed to achieve prompt MDTM treatment decisions, mainly caused by further investigations and insufficient pathology [ 30 , 31 , 32 ]. Recently, initial evidence was reported for the potential of CDSSs in lung tumor boards as using a CDSS enabled clinicians to get to higher quality decisions compared to their normal way of working (median = 3.75 out of 5; min = 3 and max = 4) [ 33 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as they evaluated only eight primary lung cancer cases, evidence regarding the real impact of CDSSs on MDTM parameters remains scarce. As professionals expected the CCDSS to provide insight into whether data essential for MDTM decision-making is complete (CFIR: Intervention characteristics), it would be worthwhile to assess its impact on MDTM care efficacy as this potentially shortens the interval from diagnosis to treatment and increases survival and quality of life [ 32 ]. Performing a usability test and validation prior to roll-out was highly prioritized by most professionals to become familiar with the system and to evaluate its performance (CFIR: Characteristics of Individuals, Process).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%