2022
DOI: 10.3390/rs14194916
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multidirectional Shift Rasterization (MDSR) Algorithm for Effective Identification of Ground in Dense Point Clouds

Abstract: With the ever-increasing popularity of unmanned aerial vehicles and other platforms providing dense point clouds, filters for the identification of ground points in such dense clouds are needed. Many filters have been proposed and are widely used, usually based on the determination of an original surface approximation and subsequent identification of points within a predefined distance from such surface. We presented a new filter, the multidirectional shift rasterization (MDSR) algorithm, which is based on a d… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, CSF showed superior vegetation removal capability compared to ATIN, which contradicts the findings of [22,29] who did not undergo the optimization process of CSF parameters. These results highlight the importance of selecting optimal parameters for accurate ground extraction.…”
Section: Decision Of Csf Parametercontrasting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, CSF showed superior vegetation removal capability compared to ATIN, which contradicts the findings of [22,29] who did not undergo the optimization process of CSF parameters. These results highlight the importance of selecting optimal parameters for accurate ground extraction.…”
Section: Decision Of Csf Parametercontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…It also faces difficulties in capturing accurate DTMs in areas with dense vegetation [18]. Methods for generating DTMs from point clouds can be broadly classified into morphological filtering methods [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29], vegetation index-based methods [30][31][32][33][34], composite methods [35][36][37][38], and machine learning-based methods [39][40][41] [35] effectively removed vegetation in steep and rugged terrains using morphological filters such as Progressive Morphological Filter (PMF), Simple Morphological Filter (SMRF), Cloth Simulation Filter (CSF), Adaptive Triangular Irregular Network (ATIN), and CAractérisation de NUages de POints (CANUPO). [42] achieved vegetation removal using CSF and ATIN.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A significant disadvantage of these data is the rarely updated sparse point cloud. From data obtained by UAS photogrammetry, TLS, and ALS methods, the RMSE of height differences in the entire compared area was determined to be 20 mm with a systematic shift of 6 mm [50]. When comparing point clouds from UAS photogrammetry and ALS, the average systematic shift had a value of 1 mm, with an RMSE value of 46 mm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the terrain anomalies of interest in our study area. The final classification threshold is then set to 0.1 m similar to comparable study sites with steep/sloping terrain in other related studies [71], [73].…”
Section: A Experimental Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%