Multiple Objective and Goal Programming 2002
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-7908-1812-3_31
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multicriterion Analysis Based on Marginal Conditional Stochastic Dominance in Financial Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The three stochastic dominance criteria, FSD, SSD and TSD, are optimal in the sense that given the assumptions regarding the investors preferences (describing as a class of utility functions), the application of the corresponding stochastic dominance criterion ensures a minimal efficient set of investment alternatives. For application of stochastic dominance see Bradley and Lehmann (1988), Levy (1992Levy ( , 1996, Ogryczak and Ruszczyski (1999), Trzpiot (1998, 2002, 2003.…”
Section: Stochastic Dominance Rules In Portfolio Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The three stochastic dominance criteria, FSD, SSD and TSD, are optimal in the sense that given the assumptions regarding the investors preferences (describing as a class of utility functions), the application of the corresponding stochastic dominance criterion ensures a minimal efficient set of investment alternatives. For application of stochastic dominance see Bradley and Lehmann (1988), Levy (1992Levy ( , 1996, Ogryczak and Ruszczyski (1999), Trzpiot (1998, 2002, 2003.…”
Section: Stochastic Dominance Rules In Portfolio Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%