1993
DOI: 10.1016/0377-2217(93)90218-c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multicriteria facility layout problem: An integrated approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, the user acceptability and confidence in the analysis provided by the AHP methodology is high when it is compared with other multiattribute decision approaches [29]. The other benefits of AHP include: providing a systematic way for subjective decision processes, serving sensitivity analysis, giving information about the evaluation criteriaÕs implicit weights, and providing better understanding and participation among the members of the decisionmaking group and hence a commitment to the chosen alternative [30].…”
Section: Ahp Methodology For Qualitative Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the user acceptability and confidence in the analysis provided by the AHP methodology is high when it is compared with other multiattribute decision approaches [29]. The other benefits of AHP include: providing a systematic way for subjective decision processes, serving sensitivity analysis, giving information about the evaluation criteriaÕs implicit weights, and providing better understanding and participation among the members of the decisionmaking group and hence a commitment to the chosen alternative [30].…”
Section: Ahp Methodology For Qualitative Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the decision-maker acceptability and confidence in the analysis provided by the AHP methodology is high when it is compared with other MADM methods (Zzkarian and Kusiak, 1999). The other advantages of the AHP include: providing a systematic methodology for subjective decision, applying in sensitivity analysis, presenting a great deal of information about the evaluation criteria's implicit weights, and providing clearer understanding and participation among the members of the decision-making group and hence a commitment to the chosen alternative (Shang, 1993).…”
Section: The Ahp Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Houshyar and White (1993) presented an exact optimal solution for facility layout by deciding that which pairs of locations should be adjacent. Shang (1993) presented an integrated approach for solving multi-criteria FLP. Tretheway and Foote (1994) developed a fast heuristic for the facilities layout problem including aisle location.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… (Shang 1993), obtiene una matriz normalizada de valores para el índice de cercanía mediante una técnica AHP en la que integra toda una serie de criterios que influyen a la hora de determinar el valor de la matriz. Estos criterios son: Seguridad, Ruidos, Flexibilidad, Estética, Temperatura y trabajo en curso.…”
Section: íNdice De Cercanía (Closeness Rating)unclassified
“…Otros autores, consideran la flexibilidad como uno de los aspectos a tener en cuenta en la evaluación de un índice de cercanía obtenido mediante AHP, de entre ellos destacan: (Shang 1993) , (Yang y Kuo 2003) y (Yang y Hung 2007).…”
Section: Figura 322 Factores Para Calcular Flf (Raman Nagalingam Yunclassified