2006
DOI: 10.2495/ut060571
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multicriteria analysis in the selection of urban highway alignment alternatives with application of the analytic hierarchy process: an environmentally sustainable approach

Abstract: This paper contains the proposition of a methodological process to be used during the planning phase of urban highways. It refers to a multicriteria analysis tool which selects the best route for a future highway considering not only geometrical engineering topics, most often used for highways definitions, but also important issues for modern society, such as environmental ones. This methodology was applied on the study of alignment alternatives of Sao Paulo's Ring Road, through interviews with some members of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the field of civil engineering, the potential of hierarchical analysis has been little explored, however examples of studies that used this tool as a decision instrument can be cited, such as: 1 - Marchezetti et al (2011), in the treatment of household waste; 2 - Silva and Souza (2011), in the selection of collectors-compactor trucks of solid waste; 3 - Lisboa and Waisman (2006) and Zayed et al (2008) in decisions related to the area of roads project; 4 - Pan (2008), in the selection of construction methods of bridges; 5 - Lai et al (2008), in the public works project; 6 -Pereira, Medeiros and Levy (2012) and Mattana et al (2012) in studies on recycling of construction waste for the manufacture of concrete and mortar.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the field of civil engineering, the potential of hierarchical analysis has been little explored, however examples of studies that used this tool as a decision instrument can be cited, such as: 1 - Marchezetti et al (2011), in the treatment of household waste; 2 - Silva and Souza (2011), in the selection of collectors-compactor trucks of solid waste; 3 - Lisboa and Waisman (2006) and Zayed et al (2008) in decisions related to the area of roads project; 4 - Pan (2008), in the selection of construction methods of bridges; 5 - Lai et al (2008), in the public works project; 6 -Pereira, Medeiros and Levy (2012) and Mattana et al (2012) in studies on recycling of construction waste for the manufacture of concrete and mortar.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As áreas de Proteção Integral são mais restritivas, uma vez que admitem apenas o uso indireto de seus recursos, e por isso devem possuir um peso maior que o das áreas de Uso Sustentável, as quais admitem o uso direto de parcela de seus recursos(BRASIL, 2000). , e pouco menor que o das Áreas Tombadas, uma vez que estas são poucas e merecem maior atenção(BRASIL, 1965).Com base em exemplos da literatura que indicam os valores normalmente utilizados nos programas de SIG para definir a superfície de custo do território(BLASCHKE & LANG, 2009;EASTMAN, 1999;LISBOA, 2006), e juntamente com o grau de restrição atribuído Com os pesos estabelecidos, é possível chegar a uma diretriz de traçado, a qual indica quais os principais pontos que devem ser evitados. Todos os pixels do mapa ficam assim, com um valor pré-estabelecido, ou seja, de acordo com o valor estipulado para cada atributo, o SIG faz com que o traçado passe pelos valores mais baixos, o que deixa o traçado dependente da diferenciação de valores entre os atributos.…”
unclassified