2001
DOI: 10.2113/gscanmin.39.2.421
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MULTICOMPONENT ELEMENTAL AND ISOTOPIC MIXING IN Ni Cu (PGE) ORES AT KAMBALDA, WESTERN AUSTRALIA

Abstract: Most magmatic Ni-Cu-(PGE) deposits are considered to have formed from sulfide-undersaturated silicate magmas and to contain a significant component of crustal sulfur that was derived via wholesale melting, partial melting, or devolatilization of wall rocks. Under such circumstances, the system may comprise a silicate magma and a sulfide magma, with or without crystalline solids, undissolved wallrock-derived xenoliths, an unmixed silicate xenomelt, or an undissolved xenovolatile phase, each of which may contain… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Noril'sk-Talnakh Region (Ripley et al 2003;Ripley & Li 2013); Duluth (Arcuri et al 1998); Voisey's Bay (Ripley et al 1999); Kambalda (Lesher & Burnham 2001); and others (see Naldrett 2004Naldrett , 2011, and references therein)). A scenario in which crustal sulphur is available for magma contamination is therefore often an important factor in Ni-Cu-PGE exploration.…”
Section: Implications For Ni-cu-pge Orthomagmatic Sulphide Mineralizamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Noril'sk-Talnakh Region (Ripley et al 2003;Ripley & Li 2013); Duluth (Arcuri et al 1998); Voisey's Bay (Ripley et al 1999); Kambalda (Lesher & Burnham 2001); and others (see Naldrett 2004Naldrett , 2011, and references therein)). A scenario in which crustal sulphur is available for magma contamination is therefore often an important factor in Ni-Cu-PGE exploration.…”
Section: Implications For Ni-cu-pge Orthomagmatic Sulphide Mineralizamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…bulk assimilation of the upper crust but can be well explained by selective assimilation of crustal sulfides. Osmium is mainly hosted in the sulfides of the continental crust (e.g., Ripley et al, 1999Ripley et al, , 2001) so that if crustal sulfides are selectively assimilated by mantle-derived magma, the 187 Os/ 188 Os ratios in the contaminated magmas will become elevated (Ripley et al, 1999;Lambert et al, 2000;Lesher and Burnham, 2001). Since crustal sulfides are not the main carriers of Nd, Sr, and REE, addition of crustal sulfides to mantle-derived magma will not significantly change eNd(t) values and REE patterns.…”
Section: Crustal Contaminationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chalcophile elements have been widely used to study the origin of magmatic sulfide deposits because they have very high partition coefficients between sulfide liquid and magma (Bezmen et al, 1994;Fleet et al, 1999) and are therefore good indicators for sulfide segregation. Re-Os isotopes are useful in detecting crustal contamination of mantle-derived magma during ore formation (e.g., Walker et al, 1994;Sproule et al, 1999;Lambert et al, 2000;Lesher and Burnham, 2001). A combination of lithophile-chalcophile trace elements and Sr-Nd-Os isotopes is widely used in assessing the role of fractional crystallization and crustal contamination in the formation of magmatic sulfide deposits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is possible that Os isotope composition heterogeneities in sulfidebearing mafic magma systems may be related to crustal contamination and sulfide segregation under different R factors. γ Os values and Re/Os ratios of sulfides are similar to those of the contaminant at low R factor, whereas γ Os values and Re/Os ratios of sulfides approach those of the magma at high R factor (Lesher and Burnham 2001). However, modeling of the R factor suggests that sulfides in Kalatongke were not formed with a single R factor process (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Assimilation of S-rich country rocks has been proposed to explain the origin of magmatic sulfide ore deposits (Lesher and Burnham 2001), and selective crustal contamination has been invoked to explain the behavior of different isotope systems during the interaction between mantle-derived magmas and crustal rocks (Watson 1982;Walker et al 1994;Ripley et al 1999Ripley et al , 2001Lambert et al 2000). In an AFC process, if the systems are variably contaminated, the Re-Os data will plot around the mixing lines between parental magmas and contaminants and form "pseudoisochrons" (DePaolo 1981).…”
Section: Formation Of the Disseminated Sulfide Orementioning
confidence: 99%