2010
DOI: 10.1007/s11805-010-0538-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multicentric gliomas misdiagnosed as metastatic tumors: One case report and literature review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…13,14 A CT scan of the chest and abdomen is standard practice, and in the absence of a primary tumor, a stereotactic biopsy will establish the correct diagnosis and provide adequate tissue for further molecular tests. 15 The differential diagnosis also includes central nervous system lymphoma and inflammatory diseases such as tumefactive multiple sclerosis. 16,17 Such demyelinating lesions can mimic tumors, 18 and among misdiagnoses, a low-grade astrocytoma is the most frequent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13,14 A CT scan of the chest and abdomen is standard practice, and in the absence of a primary tumor, a stereotactic biopsy will establish the correct diagnosis and provide adequate tissue for further molecular tests. 15 The differential diagnosis also includes central nervous system lymphoma and inflammatory diseases such as tumefactive multiple sclerosis. 16,17 Such demyelinating lesions can mimic tumors, 18 and among misdiagnoses, a low-grade astrocytoma is the most frequent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 10 24 ] Next, multicentric tumours (MCGBM) are multiple separate lesions without any clear microscopic or macroscopic connection. [ 25 31 ] The incidence of MLGBM has a wide range from 0.5% to 20%,[ 1 4 9 14 17 24 32 ] and most of them are found in the supratentorial component, especially in the frontal and parietal lobes. [ 1 ] Overall, it is difficult to differentiate between MFGBM and MCGBM with available imaging technology or their histological features.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the undoubted advantages of conventional contrast-enhanced MRI in diagnosing McGs, their differentiation from other multiple cerebral pathologies such as metastases, lymphoma, infections and vascular or demyelinating diseases may prove difficult or even impossible 8,9,24 . Conventional MRI has a limited capacity to differentiate McGs from multiple brain metastases, because their neuroimaging appearance is often similar, equivocal, or indistinguishable 8,24,25 , as was the case with the parietal lesion in our patient. An additional difficulty in distinguishing these intracerebral lesions is posed by the possibility of the simultaneous presence of brain metastasis in patients affected by glioma, even multicentric 6,18 .…”
Section: Discusionmentioning
confidence: 99%