2020
DOI: 10.1155/2020/1752571
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiagent Task Allocation in Complementary Teams: A Hunter-and-Gatherer Approach

Abstract: Consider a dynamic task allocation problem, where tasks are unknowingly distributed over an environment. This paper considers each task comprised of two sequential subtasks: detection and completion, where each subtask can only be carried out by a certain type of agent. We address this problem using a novel nature-inspired approach called "hunter and gatherer". The proposed method employs two complementary teams of agents: one agile in detecting (hunters) and another dexterous in completing (gatherers) the tas… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides, this work introduces a coordination factor designated for gatherers through which their behaviors range from completely indifferent to highly coordinated to hunters' locations in the environment. By the way of extensive simulations, we demonstrate that the effectiveness of the proposed algorithms is superior to the performance of the benchmark work [9]. Moreover, statistical analysis of the simulation results shows that the lack of an effective coordination between hunters and gatherers significantly hurts the total effectiveness of the planning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Besides, this work introduces a coordination factor designated for gatherers through which their behaviors range from completely indifferent to highly coordinated to hunters' locations in the environment. By the way of extensive simulations, we demonstrate that the effectiveness of the proposed algorithms is superior to the performance of the benchmark work [9]. Moreover, statistical analysis of the simulation results shows that the lack of an effective coordination between hunters and gatherers significantly hurts the total effectiveness of the planning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Approach. In this section, we aim to compare the newly developed planning algorithms addressing the exploration and coordination aspects of the hunter-and-gatherer scenario with the benchmark hunter-and-gatherer mission planning introduced in [9]. To that end, we conduct the comparison in three environments containing different configurations of obstacles, as described in Figure 7.…”
Section: Functionality Validation Of the Hunter-and-gatherermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this paper, we consider the workload balancing assignment issue in a nature-inspired problem proposed in [9,10], called "hunter and gatherer." More specifically, the dynamic MRTA problem is transfigured into a scenario where each task is composed of two sequential subtasks-exploration and completion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%