2013
DOI: 10.1609/aaai.v27i1.8698
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiagent Knowledge and Belief Change in the Situation Calculus

Abstract: Belief change is an important research topic in AI. It becomes more perplexing in multi-agent settings, since the action of an agent may be partially observable to other agents. In this paper, we present a general approach to reasoning about actions and belief change in multi-agent settings. Our approach is based on a multi-agent extension to the situation calculus, augmented by a plausibility relation over situations and another one over actions, which is used to represent agents' different perspectives on ac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the single-agent case, Shapiro et al [21] and Delgrande and Levesque [10] integrated belief revision into the situation calculus, by augmenting it with a notion of plausibility over situations. In the multi-agent case, by integrating action priority update from DELs into the situation calculus, Fang and Liu [12] gave a general framework for reasoning about actions and belief change.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the single-agent case, Shapiro et al [21] and Delgrande and Levesque [10] integrated belief revision into the situation calculus, by augmenting it with a notion of plausibility over situations. In the multi-agent case, by integrating action priority update from DELs into the situation calculus, Fang and Liu [12] gave a general framework for reasoning about actions and belief change.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While progression may be preferable over regression for long sequences of action, it has the disadvantage that the resulting knowledge base is not always first-order representable. Besides (Shapiro et al 2011;Schwering and Lakemeyer 2014), a number of other proposals such as (Demolombe and Pozos Parra 2006;Delgrande and Levesque 2012;Fang and Liu 2013) have dealt with extending action formalisms with belief revision in the spirit of AGM (Alchourron, Gärdenfors, and Makinson 1985). In (Pagnucco et al 2013) a limited solution to the projection problem in action theories derived from (Shapiro et al 2011) is proposed by a translation to Default Logic extended with preferences (Baumann et al 2010), together with an implementation using Answer Set Programming (Gelfond 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%