2022
DOI: 10.1109/jssc.2022.3149910
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-Watt-Level 4.9-GHz Silicon Power Amplifier for Portable Thermoacoustic Imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, a LiDAR system may require a power-hungry transmitter (TX), such as a >40-W pulsed laser diode [6], [7]; and it is also an expensive solution, making it less attractive for consumer-grade drone applications. Ultrasound imaging [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], on the other hand, can provide low-power 3-D-depth information and works well even in complex lighting conditions (bright/dark) as well as in rainy/foggy weather. Of course, this comes at the cost of lower spatial resolution when compared to CIS or LiDAR, but this is not a major issue in drone navigation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, a LiDAR system may require a power-hungry transmitter (TX), such as a >40-W pulsed laser diode [6], [7]; and it is also an expensive solution, making it less attractive for consumer-grade drone applications. Ultrasound imaging [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], on the other hand, can provide low-power 3-D-depth information and works well even in complex lighting conditions (bright/dark) as well as in rainy/foggy weather. Of course, this comes at the cost of lower spatial resolution when compared to CIS or LiDAR, but this is not a major issue in drone navigation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of course, this comes at the cost of lower spatial resolution when compared to CIS or LiDAR, but this is not a major issue in drone navigation. Previously, UISs [10], [11], [12], [13], [14] shown successful results for biomedical applications. Due to the slow sound speed (343 m/s in air compared to 1540 m/s in tissue) and long detection range compared to in vivo, air-channel ultrasound imaging [15], [16], [17], [18] possesses a different challenge in how to achieve adequate framerate with a limited number of transmissions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%