2024
DOI: 10.1109/tnnls.2022.3192445
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-View Graph Learning by Joint Modeling of Consistency and Inconsistency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Xie et al [25] extended the tensorized multi-view subspace clustering by further incorporating a local structure constraint. Liang et al [5], [11] performed graph fusion on multiple K-NN graphs from multiple views with cross-view consistency and inconsistency jointly modeled.…”
Section: Multi-view Clusteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Xie et al [25] extended the tensorized multi-view subspace clustering by further incorporating a local structure constraint. Liang et al [5], [11] performed graph fusion on multiple K-NN graphs from multiple views with cross-view consistency and inconsistency jointly modeled.…”
Section: Multi-view Clusteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The affinity graph construction is a basic step in many MVC algorithms, which formulates the sample-wise relationship by computing an N × N affinity matrix and generally takes O(N 2 d) time and O(N 2 ) space, where N is the number of samples and d is the dimension. The graph partitioning (typically by spectral clustering) is another computationally expensive step in many MVC algorithms [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], which often requires singular value decomposition (SVD) and takes O(N 3 ) time and O(N 2 ) space. Especially, the graph partitioning via spectral clustering is adopted as an important step in many MVC algorithms, such as multiview spectral clustering [3], [8], multi-view subspace clustering [6], [9], and multi-view graph learning [4], [5], which, together with some other expensive matrix computations, contributes to the O(N 3 ) complexity bottleneck in these MVC algorithms [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CIFAR-100 ImageNet-10 ImageNet-Dogs Tiny-ImageNet K-means [17] 8.4 11.9 5.5 6.5 SC [18] 9.0 15.1 3.8 6.3 AC [43] 9.8 13.8 3.7 6.9 NMF [44] 7.9 (NMI) [40], clustering accuracy (ACC) [41], and adjusted rand index (ARI) [42].…”
Section: Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the consistency of graph-based multi-view clustering has attracted considerable attention. For example, Reference [13] proposed a method to simultaneously construct the consistency and inconsistency of multiple views in the objective function to delete the inconsistent parts and preserve the consistent parts. However, Reference [14] mainly focuses on the consistency and inconsistency of multi-view subspace clustering.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%