1982
DOI: 10.15807/jorsj.25.334
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-Variate Stopping Problems With a Monotone Rule

Abstract: A monetone rule is introduced to surn up individual declarations in amulti-variate stoppingpreblem.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since By taking the derivative of both sides of (13.22) with respect to T , we have the following differential equation: which are the threshold of the control-limit strategy and the expected reward for the infinite horizon problem (refer to Table 3.1 of [10] for the discrete time case) .…”
Section: V(t − S) G(ds)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since By taking the derivative of both sides of (13.22) with respect to T , we have the following differential equation: which are the threshold of the control-limit strategy and the expected reward for the infinite horizon problem (refer to Table 3.1 of [10] for the discrete time case) .…”
Section: V(t − S) G(ds)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As one abstraction of such a situation, we shall try to propose a multivalued stopping game by introducing a monotone logical function to sum up each individual's opinion. The discrete-time case has already been discussed [4], [10]. Here we consider the continuous-time case, which is formulated as a multiobjective extension of Karlin's model [3] and a rule's extension of Sakaguchi's model [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A group decision has to be taken by defining a stopping rule. Several stopping rules were proposed in Szajowski and Yasuda (1997), Kurano et al (1980), and Yasuda et al (1982), namely, each DM can stop the selection process, or if r or more DMs decide to stop, the process is then stopped. Sakaguchi and Mazalov (2004) avoided conflicting situations by the use of a probability p that generates an overall decision for both DMs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many versions of games connected with these problems. For example, one can mention the papers of Enns & Ferenstein in [I], (21,Presman & Sonin [131,Majumdar [lo], [Ill,Nikolaev [121,Sakaguchi [18],[19], [20], Fushimi [51 and Kurano,Yasuda & Nakagami [9], 1211. [20], [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sakaguchi [I91 considered the case of the bilateral game where observed values of bilateral random variables are accepted only when both players agree to accept. Kurano, Yasuda & Nakagami [ 9 ] ,[21] and Sakaguchi[20] admit that at any step each player makes a decision whether to select or to reject the variables and observations are terminated when at least r players accept the variable.The present paper generalizes the results of the papers [I],…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%