2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11600-020-00417-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-variable calibration of hydrological model in the upper Omo-Gibe basin, Ethiopia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The model was calibrated with gauge discharge at the outlet of the basin and there is possibility of overfitting. Hence it is necessary to calibrating with multiple WBCs to avoid overfitting [33]. The model simulate temporal trend of five WBCs over 11 sub catchments for past twenty year period.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The model was calibrated with gauge discharge at the outlet of the basin and there is possibility of overfitting. Hence it is necessary to calibrating with multiple WBCs to avoid overfitting [33]. The model simulate temporal trend of five WBCs over 11 sub catchments for past twenty year period.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pre-calibration helped to identify the major sensitivity parameters and then further tuned in the post-calibration. Now days the GIS based time series of regional AE data is used in data scarce scenarios to calibrate and validate the hydrological model [33,41,42]. In this study, the performance of models was evaluated with an open source GIS based global AE model.…”
Section: Model Calibration and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mô hình SWAT được chạy với bộ dữ liệu lượng mưa CHIRPS để đánh giá khả năng sử dụng dữ liệu mưa CHIRPS phục vụ mô phỏng dòng chảy trên lưu vực thông qua quá trình hiệu chỉnh và kiểm định mô hình. Việc hiệu chỉnh mô hình được thực hiện tự động với công cụ SWAT-CUP sử dụng thuật toán SUFI2 [13][14][15][16]. SWAT-CUP cho phép hiệu chỉnh, kiểm định, phân tích độ nhạy và độ bất định của mô hình [17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Chỉ Số Thống Kê đơN Vị Phương Trình đIểm Hoàn Hảounclassified
“…The pairwise comparisons of measured and predicted discharges are commonly utilized to assess model performance in calibration and validation periods using numerical performance indicators such as the coefficient of determination (R 2 ), the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE), the Kling-Gupta efficiency (KGE), and graphical method [51][52][53][54][55]. Some authors have modified the pairwise comparisons to account for measurement uncertainties [25,56].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%