2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10709-012-9646-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-trait evolution of farmer varieties of bread wheat after cultivation in contrasting organic farming systems in Europe

Abstract: Because of the lack of varieties for organic agriculture, associations of organic farmers in several European countries have begun cultivating landraces and historic varieties, effectively practicing in situ conservation of agricultural biodiversity. To promote agrobiodiversity conservation, a special list for "conservation varieties" was implemented in 2008 by the EU because for any exchange and marketing of seeds in the EU, a variety must be registered in an official catalog. Our study aimed at improving kno… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Crop plants have been selected to produce high seed yields under conditions of high intraspecific densities (Weiner, Andersen, Wille, Griepentrog, & Olsen, 2010); however, native plants used for restoration may need more space in between plants (i.e., less intraspecific competition), or may need specific localized commensalisms (e.g., parasites or mycorhizae) in order to produce profitable yields (Felton et al, 2016). Increasingly, evidence suggests that fieldscale diversification promotes native pollination systems (Kremen & M'Gonigle, 2015), while high intraspecific densities within SPA may make populations more susceptible to disease (Dawson et al, 2012;Jensen, Dreiseitl, Sadiki, & Schoen, 2011;Lankau & Strauss, 2011;Shykoff & Bucheli, 1995). Disease management within SPA may require intercropping or even more careful attention to intraspecific genotypic diversity (Parker, 1986).…”
Section: Understanding Species Biology;mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crop plants have been selected to produce high seed yields under conditions of high intraspecific densities (Weiner, Andersen, Wille, Griepentrog, & Olsen, 2010); however, native plants used for restoration may need more space in between plants (i.e., less intraspecific competition), or may need specific localized commensalisms (e.g., parasites or mycorhizae) in order to produce profitable yields (Felton et al, 2016). Increasingly, evidence suggests that fieldscale diversification promotes native pollination systems (Kremen & M'Gonigle, 2015), while high intraspecific densities within SPA may make populations more susceptible to disease (Dawson et al, 2012;Jensen, Dreiseitl, Sadiki, & Schoen, 2011;Lankau & Strauss, 2011;Shykoff & Bucheli, 1995). Disease management within SPA may require intercropping or even more careful attention to intraspecific genotypic diversity (Parker, 1986).…”
Section: Understanding Species Biology;mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Care should be taken to avoid genetic shifts during seed multiplication phases in lowland environments of species meant for high‐altitude resowing. Peratoner () indicated in three generations the limit for seed multiplication to minimize the risk of genetic shifts in environments markedly different from those of germplasm origin, although genetic shifts after only two generations have been observed in agricultural systems (Dawson et al ., ). Differences in survival and/or fitness among genotypes due to differential adaptation to the environment of growth may result in severe alterations of a population genetic background with possible loss of misadapted individuals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The information obtained from experiments can be enriched when analyzed in a multivariate model, since selection of genotypes should not be based on only one character (DAWSON et al, 2012;YEATER et al, 2015). Multivariate analysis of variance can identify the existing (co) variation between the response variables (HAIR et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%