2022
DOI: 10.3390/rs14102301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-Temporal Satellite Image Composites in Google Earth Engine for Improved Landslide Visibility: A Case Study of a Glacial Landscape

Abstract: Regional early warning systems for landslides rely on historic data to forecast future events and to verify and improve alarms. However, databases of landslide events are often spatially biased towards roads or other infrastructure, with few reported in remote areas. In this study, we demonstrate how Google Earth Engine can be used to create multi-temporal change detection image composites with freely available Sentinel-1 and -2 satellite images, in order to improve landslide visibility and facilitate landslid… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
31
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
31
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Histograms of the detection results of Table 2 are presented in Figure 17. The highest success ratio is achieved by the methods of [44] and [46] with almost comparable results, as expected due to the similarities in the calculated change detection data (Sentinel-2 10 m) and parameters (time-series of normalized difference vegetation index). The worst percentage was achieved by ALDI [47], probably due to the lower resolution data used (Landsat multispectral bands with 30 m resolution instead of 10 m for Sentinel-2).…”
Section: Comparison With Automated Mapping Methodssupporting
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Histograms of the detection results of Table 2 are presented in Figure 17. The highest success ratio is achieved by the methods of [44] and [46] with almost comparable results, as expected due to the similarities in the calculated change detection data (Sentinel-2 10 m) and parameters (time-series of normalized difference vegetation index). The worst percentage was achieved by ALDI [47], probably due to the lower resolution data used (Landsat multispectral bands with 30 m resolution instead of 10 m for Sentinel-2).…”
Section: Comparison With Automated Mapping Methodssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…We present a comparison of our manual rapid mapping using Sentinel-2 images, with a series of recent workflows and codes that use the multi-temporal analysis of satellite imagery in Google Earth Engine [44][45][46][47]. While this comparison is not straightforward due to the different workflow, data and time frame used by either rapid manual mapping or automated multi-temporal analysis, this is an interesting case study to compare them.…”
Section: Comparison With Automated Mapping Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In July 2019, an extremely heavy rainfall event triggered multiple landslides in the (formerly named) Jølster municipality in Western Norway [34]. The road authority reported 14 landslides on this date, while mapping from Sentinel-2 images detected 120 events, with only 30% being located within 500 m of a road, compared to 100% of those registered by the road authority [35]. NVE used aerial and satellite images to manually map polygons representing the landslide and performed a quality control of the existing landslide point data.…”
Section: Norway Setting and Case Studymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…There is a strong need for improved landslide mapping techniques in Norway, which can provide objective and accurate spatial information, and also allowing the detection of events that occur away from populated areas and transport routes. Recent studies have demonstrated there is great potential to improve detection of landslides in remote areas using satellite images [34,35].…”
Section: Norway Setting and Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%