2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsr.2017.01.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-temporal Optimal Power Flow for voltage control in MV networks using Distributed Energy Resources

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…After performing the MV grid optimisation at the CAMC level, the final step is developed at the MG level. This stage is intended to compute a feasible solution at the MG level through an OPF-like approach based on Meirinhos et al [23] and similar to those of Sun and Zhang [24], taking into account its internal capabilities for voltage and reactive power support (PV reactive power generation and idle voltage definition at each VSI while also complying with the boundary bus operation point defined at the MV stage. Note that (15) corresponds to the minimisation of active power losses in the MG and it is subjected to the power balance constraints for each node as in (16) and 17, bus voltage constraints in (18) and (19), reactive power constraint in the swing bus (18) and devices technical constraints in (20)- (22).…”
Section: Mg Stagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…After performing the MV grid optimisation at the CAMC level, the final step is developed at the MG level. This stage is intended to compute a feasible solution at the MG level through an OPF-like approach based on Meirinhos et al [23] and similar to those of Sun and Zhang [24], taking into account its internal capabilities for voltage and reactive power support (PV reactive power generation and idle voltage definition at each VSI while also complying with the boundary bus operation point defined at the MV stage. Note that (15) corresponds to the minimisation of active power losses in the MG and it is subjected to the power balance constraints for each node as in (16) and 17, bus voltage constraints in (18) and (19), reactive power constraint in the swing bus (18) and devices technical constraints in (20)- (22).…”
Section: Mg Stagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scientific articles analyzed: [ 6 , 7 , 10 , 23 , 27 , 29 , 30 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 , 86 , 87 , 88 , 89 , 90 , 91 , 92 , 93 , 94 , 95 , 96 , 97 , 98 ].…”
Section: Main Textunclassified
“…In [7], the inverter interfaced DGs, OLTC, and SCs are operated in different time scales to mitigate the fast voltage variation caused by stochastically varied renewable generation. A multi-temporal optimisation problem is formulated in [8] to control the voltage in a distribution network with various voltage/var regulators. The curtailment of DGs and loads are utilised in the model, and a metaheuristic algorithm is used to find the optimal solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%